SACW | Nov. 22, 2006 | Abdus Salam, Music and Mullahs, Human rights Sri Lanka, Communalising Memory, Malegaon, Sachar Report, Mangalore, Domestic violence, People's foreign policy

Harsh Kapoor aiindex at mnet.fr
Wed Nov 22 06:36:57 CST 2006


South Asia Citizens Wire  | November 22, 2006 | Dispatch No. 2321

[1]  Pakistan: The tragedy of our treatment of Dr 
Abdus Salam (Edit., Daily Times)
[2]  Pakistan: Mullahs and Music - Music hits 
some controversial keys (Nirupama Subramanian)
[3]  Sri Lanka: Positive Action is Required in 
Both Humanitarian and Human Rights Spheres (NPC)
[4]  India: Democracy Besieged (Ram Puniyani)
[5]  India: Memories, Saffronising Statues and 
Constructing Communal Politics (Badri Narayan)
[6]  USA - India: Future of the right wing, there and over here (Harish Khare)
[7]  India: Discuss Mangalore violence in Parliament
[8]  India: Domestic Violence Act - A ray of hope (Ratna Kapur)
[9]  India: Upcoming Events: 
  (i)  Conference Right to Food and Right to Life (Lucknow, 26 November 2006)
(ii) Conference on People's Foreign Policy (Bombay, 7-8 December 2006)
____


[1] 

Daily Times
November 22, 2006

EDITORIAL: The tragedy of our treatment of Dr Abdus Salam

Dr Abdus Salam (1926-1996) died ten years ago. He 
was the first Pakistani to get a Nobel Prize in 
1979. But he might be the last if we continue to 
allow our state to evolve in a way that frightens 
the rest of the world. Our collective psyche runs 
more to accepted 'wisdom' than to scientific 
inquiry; and even if we were to display an 
uncharacteristic outcropping of individual genius 
the world may be so frightened of it that it 
might not give us our deserts.

We are scared of honouring Dr Salam because of 
our constitution which we have amended to declare 
his community as 'non-Muslim'. When Dr Salam died 
in 1996 he had to be buried in Pakistan because 
he refused to give up his Pakistani nationality 
and acquire another that respected him more. But 
the Pakistani state was afraid of touching his 
dead body. He was therefore buried in Rabwa, the 
home town of his Ahmedi community whose name is 
also unacceptable to us and has been changed to 
Chenab Nagar by a state proclamation. But that 
was not the end of the story. After he was 
buried, the pious, law-abiding and 
constitution-loving people of Jhang, which is 
nearby, went over to Chenab Nagar to see if all 
had been done according to the constitutional 
provisions regarding the Ahmedi community to 
which he belonged.

And what did the constitution say? It said that 
the Ahmedis are not Muslims, that they may not 
call themselves Muslims, nor say the kalima or 
use any of the symbols of Islam. The original 
amendments to the constitution were passed by Z A 
Bhutto, a 'liberal socialist-democrat', and 
subsequent tightening of the law was done by the 
great patriot General Zia-ul Haq. Thus both the 
civilians and the khakis had connived in the 
great betrayal of Dr Salam.

After the great scientist was buried in Chenab 
Nagar, his tombstone said 'Abdus Salam the First 
Muslim Nobel Laureate'. Needless to say, the 
police arrived with a magistrate and rubbed off 
the 'Muslim' part of the katba. Now the tombstone 
says: Abdus Salam the First Nobel Laureate. The 
magistrate remained unfazed by what he had done 
but Dr Salam's grave is actually the tombstone of 
a Muslim culture that Pakistan had inherited from 
the founder of the nation, Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad 
Ali Jinnah. But ironies fly thick in Pakistan. In 
Jhang, for example, where Dr Salam grew up as a 
precocious child, the schools that he endowed 
with scholarships and grants now teach communal 
hatred rather than the love that he had in mind 
when he gave them his money.

Meanwhile, the Ahmedi community is under daily 
pressure and anyone with a twisted mind is free 
to persecute them.

Abdus Salam was born in Jhang in 1926. At the age 
of 14, he got the highest marks ever recorded for 
the Matriculation Examination in Punjab. The 
whole town turned out to welcome him. He won a 
scholarship to Government College, Lahore, and 
took his MA in 1946. In the same year he was 
awarded a scholarship to St. John's College, 
Cambridge, where he took a BA (honours) with a 
double First in mathematics and physics in 1949. 
In 1950 he received the Smith's Prize from 
Cambridge University for the most outstanding 
pre-doctoral contribution to physics. He also 
obtained a PhD in theoretical physics at 
Cambridge; his thesis, published in 1951, 
contained fundamental work in quantum 
electrodynamics which had already gained him an 
international reputation.

In 1954 Dr Salam left his native country for a 
lectureship at Cambridge University. Before the 
Pakistani politicians apostatised him, he was a 
member of the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission, 
a member of the Scientific Commission of Pakistan 
and Chief Scientific Adviser to the President 
from 1961 to 1974. Pakistan's space research 
agency Suparco was created by him and it is only 
symbolic that a group of Shia workers of Suparco 
were put to death in Karachi in 2004 by sectarian 
terrorists. Like Dr Salam, a lot of gifted Shia 
doctors have had to leave Pakistan because of the 
state's twisted policies.

Dr Abdus Salam got his Nobel Prize for Physics in 
1979. It was a most embarrassing moment for 
General Zia who had 'supplemented' the Second 
Amendment to the constitution with further comic 
disabilities against the Ahmedis. He had to 
welcome the great scientist and had to be seen 
with him on TV. Since the clerical part of his 
government was already bristling, he took care to 
clip those sections of Dr Salam's speech where he 
had said the kalima or otherwise used an Islamic 
expression. It was Dr Salam's good luck that one 
of the believers did not go to court under Zia's 
own laws to get the country's only Nobel laureate 
sent to prison for six months of rigorous 
imprisonment. Dr Salam then went to India where 
he was received with great fanfare. He had gone 
there to simply meet his primary school 
mathematics teacher who was still alive. When the 
two met, Dr Salam took off his Nobel medal and 
put it around the neck of his teacher.

Let us admit in a whisper that Pakistan did issue 
a stamp commemorating Dr Salam years ago - lest 
the government come under pressure to remove it 
from circulation. It is also true that his alma 
mater, Government College Lahore, now a 
university, has named certain ancillary 
departments and academic sessions after him 
following a long period of obscurantist 
domination. But Pakistan needs to feel guilty 
about what it has done to the greatest scientist 
it ever produced in comparison to the lionisation 
of Dr AQ Khan who has brought ignominy and the 
label of 'rogue state' to Pakistan by selling the 
country's nuclear technology for personal gain. 
Can we redeem ourselves by doing something in Dr 
Salam's memory on this 10th anniversary of his 
passing that would please his soul and cleanse 
ours? *

______


[2]

The Hindu
November 22, 2006

MUSIC HITS SOME CONTROVERSIAL KEYS

by Nirupama Subramanian

The introduction of a Master's course in music at 
the University of Punjab in Lahore is seen by 
many, despite the protests by the Islami 
Jameeiat-e-Taleba, as a "big victory."

IN A basement room at the Alhamra cultural centre 
in Lahore, a few men and one woman are seated on 
a dhurrie, deep in discussion. Hands poised on a 
harmonium, one of them is making a point about 
the music styles of different ghazal singers.

"It is important for a singer to develop his own 
style. When someone tries to copy a great like 
Mehdi Hassan, no matter how good you are, you 
will be caught short," says the man at the 
harmonium, Jamsehd Azam. He teaches the Light 
Music section of the Master's music programme at 
the University of Punjab in Lahore, and his class 
is not very different from music classes anywhere 
in the subcontinent. Except that this is the 
first time ever music is being formally taught at 
the University of Punjab, a move that has pitted 
University officials against students affiliated 
to an Islamic party.

Activists of the Islami Jameeiat-e-Taleba, the 
students' wing of the Jamaat-e-Islami, took to 
the streets of Lahore, describing the course as 
anti-Islamic and demanding that it be scrapped. 
But the University, apparently determined to 
battle a wave of orthodoxy and conservatism 
sweeping through its student body in recent 
times, refused to back down. With 11 students and 
a faculty of five, the M.A. music course began in 
late September. All the students have previous 
training in music.

"The idea is not to turn out first-rate singers 
but people who can appreciate and relate to their 
cultural heritage and that of others," says Asrar 
Chishti, one of the faculty members. Included in 
the degree is a course on Western music 
appreciation, taught by a Westerner. Classes have 
begun in right earnest, and it seems that the IJT 
has withdrawn defeated.

"Music in Pakistan is not taboo. It's everywhere, 
it's on the radio, it's on television. Even the 
leader of the Jamaat-e-Islami uses music in his 
election campaign, the Jameeiat students also use 
music when they go on a fund-raising campaign. So 
the opposition did not make sense to anyone, and 
the IJT was obviously on a weak wicket," said 
Hasan Shahnawaz Zaidi, principal of the College 
of Arts and Design, which offers the music degree 
programme.

But as Mr. Zaidi said, the protests against the 
introduction of a department of music were only 
part of the larger battle the IJT is fighting to 
assert its clout in the University. In many ways, 
it is a mirror of the larger political battle 
between those who want Pakistan to be an Islamic 
theocratic state and those who want a modern 
Islamic republic, brought to the fore recently 
with the adoption by Pakistan's Lower House of 
the Women's Protection Bill.

The IJT considers Punjab University its 
stronghold. Indeed, the IJT won the annual 
students' union election every year from 1971 
until 1983, when the Zia-ul-Haq regime banned 
students' unions. But the IJT survived, thanks to 
Pakistan's jihad project in Afghanistan. In 1989, 
the only year students' elections were held after 
that, the IJT triumphed.

In the last few years, despite the continuing bar 
on students' politics, the IJT appears to have 
been strengthened for a number of reasons. Some 
faculty members cite the "indefensible" policies 
of the United States that is radicalising Muslim 
youth everywhere. Some say it is still powerful 
because in its heyday, it influenced appointments 
to the administration and faculty. Many of those 
people are still in their jobs, and function as 
the IJT's "eyes and ears" on the campus. Some 
point to the scholarships the IJT gives to needy 
students, subsidising tuition, hostel, and 
canteen fees.

Considerable street power

The IJT's street power became apparent when it 
responded to the rustication of some of its 
activists on a variety of charges including arson 
- many of them were involved in the protest 
against the music course - by blocking traffic 
and paralysing Lahore for most of a day. In the 
last few weeks, the IJT, which claims to have 
60,000 affiliated students in 50 universities and 
colleges nationwide, has been working towards 
holding November-end protests across Pakistan. 
Its demands: restore students' unions, Islamise 
education, and roll back the "secularisation" of 
the syllabus.

"Music is only the thin edge of the wedge," said 
Khalid Waqas, national assistant 
secretary-general of the IJT. The students' party 
has an office with a generous compound on 
Ferozepur Road, a prime commercial district of 
Lahore. "The education policy of the government 
should reflect and promote the values and culture 
of Islam, and music has no place in it. The 
government has launched some educational policies 
in order to subvert Islam, the main reason for 
which we fought for and won this country," said 
Mr. Waqas.

His colleague, the party information secretary 
Abdul Wadood, said it was a victory for the IJT 
that the University could not start the music 
classes on campus, but had to hire a room at the 
Alhamra. But teachers said the music course would 
move to the campus as soon as a new building, 
complete with sound-proof rooms and studios, was 
ready.

Last month, the IJT conducted a nation-wide 
"referendum" of students and professionals, in 
which it posed the question: "Do you want a 
secular education?" Ballot boxes were placed in 
colleges, universities, courts, and also at 
places such as bus-stops and market squares. 
According to Mr. Wadood, out of 2.1 million 
responses, only 1,000 said yes.

Aside from the important issue of the syllabus, 
the party seeks to exert influence in other areas 
too. The IJT runs a parallel admissions 
counselling regime, in an attempt to win over 
students right at the start. It also seeks to 
control how students conduct themselves. At the 
University's new campus alongside Lahore's leafy 
Canal Road, a bamboo screen came up recently in 
one of the canteens to separate the women 
students from the men.

In the College of Arts and Design, housed in the 
stately red-brick buildings of the old campus, 
such segregation is not yet visible. Girls and 
boys are chatting away together, sitting - like 
students anywhere - on the floors of the 
corridor. But on the new campus, where the IJT is 
most active, women wearing veils are more 
visible, and boys have been thrashed for talking 
to girls, in one instance, for taking a group 
photo with them. In the hostels, the IJT runs 
classes on Islam and the Koran, attended by 
students who benefit from its largesse.

The IJT denies beating up anyone for interacting 
with women students or enforcing segregation of 
the sexes and a dress code for women on campus. 
But, said Mr. Waqas, "we are an Islamic party, 
and it is natural that we will encourage 
practices that are in keeping with the religion 
and discourage those that go against it." 
According to him, parents are secure in the 
knowledge that the IJT will ensure the security 
of their daughters and the "good behaviour" of 
their sons while they pursue their studies.

The violent incidents on campus, Mr. Waqas said, 
were not a consequence of the IJT's activities 
but of the absence of a platform for students to 
express themselves after the ban on students' 
unions.

But in this ongoing battle, many faculty and 
students view the introduction of the music 
course as a "big victory" for Vice-Chancellor 
Ershad Mahmud, a retired army general handpicked 
by President Pervez Musharraf to enforce 
discipline on campus.

At the Alhamra centre, the students in Jamshed 
Azam's music class are unruffled at all the 
controversy, convinced it is all an exaggeration 
of the media, and are more concerned with hitting 
the right notes.


______


[3]

National Peace Council
of Sri Lanka
12/14 Purana Vihara Road
Colombo 6
Tel:  2818344, 2854127, 2819064
Tel/Fax: 2819064
E Mail:  peace2 at sri.lanka.net
Internet:  www.peace-srilanka.org

21.11.06

Media Release

POSITIVE ACTION IS REQUIRED IN BOTH HUMANITARIAN AND HUMAN RIGHTS SPHERES

President Mahinda Rajapaksa's decision to open 
the A9 Highway to Jaffna as a one-time measure to 
send humanitarian supplies to Jaffna has come as 
a positive response to the prevailing 
humanitarian crisis in the north east. For weeks 
humanitarian organisations have been urging the 
government and LTTE to open the highway as it is 
an obligation under the Ceasefire Agreement, to 
which both the parties affirm they are still 
committed. The National Peace Council welcomes 
the President's decision, which demonstrates that 
the government is prepared to take the 
humanitarian needs of all people into 
consideration. We hope that the LTTE responds 
positively and that this one-time measure will 
transformed into a permanent one in keeping with 
the Ceasefire Agreement.

In a similar vein, there is a need for the 
government to take positive action with regard to 
the human rights crisis in the country. Where 
internal processes fail to provide justice to the 
people, it is incumbent on the international 
community to ensure that a satisfactory solution 
is given to those who complain that they are 
being deprived of the protection of the rule of 
law. Actions such as the recent killing of five 
students in Vavuniya after a military patrol was 
ambushed is totally unacceptable, but those 
guilty are seldom if ever brought to justice.

A continuing human rights problem that needs 
serious attention by the government is with 
regard to the issues highlighted after the recent 
visit to Sri Lanka of Allan Rock, the special 
advisor to the UN's Rapporteur on Violence 
against Children. Among his findings, Mr Rock 
reported that forcible child recruitment today 
was not limited to the LTTE, but that the 
breakaway Karuna group was engaging in similar 
practices with the support of some elements of 
the Sri Lankan military. This is a position that 
has been confirmed by the Sri Lankan Monitoring 
Mission, but it has been contested by the 
government.

The National Peace Council condemns the practice 
of recruitment of child soldiers whether by the 
LTTE or by the Karuna group. One of the reasons 
for the international bans on the LTTE has been 
its continued recruitment of child soldiers 
against internationally accepted norms. It is the 
responsibility of the government to ensure that 
the actions of its military are consistent with 
internationally accepted norms.  We call on the 
government and LTTE to agree to appoint an 
independent commission of inquiry with UN 
observers to look into the problem of child 
recruitment in all areas of the country, 
including LTTE-held areas.


Executive Director
On behalf of the Governing Council

______


[4]

Issues in Secular Politics
November 2006 II

DEMOCRACY BESIEGED

Ram Puniyani

There may be various parameters to judge the 
prevalence of democratic spirit in a country. One 
of them may be how well the minorities are doing, 
how safe they feel, how aligned they feel, how 
much at home they feel. Whatever was the answer 
to these questions couple of decades earlier, 
today it seems the answer to these questions is 
becoming more and more negative and the 
quantitative worsening of these parameters is 
leading to the qualitative transformation of 
social scene towards abysmal social scenario.
One has been hearing the aggressive propaganda 
that minorities are being appeased in this 
country for the vote bank politics. This was 
being ‘successfully' injected to the societal 
consciousness despite Gopal Singh Commission, 
which portrayed the grim picture of the socio 
economic condition of the Muslim minority.  Close 
to two decades later Rajinder Sachar Committee, 
on the basis of thorough inquiry has not only 
confirmed what Gopal Singh Commission found but 
also that trends are in the direction of further 
worsening of the socio-political indices of 
Muslim minorities.  The data shows that Muslim 
community is at the bottom of economic indices, 
being worse than even the SCs, STs. They are 
worse off in education, and are far behind OBCs 
in employment. Their representation in judiciary, 
bureaucracy is very poor compared to their 
percentage in population, and more so in class I 
and II jobs, they are very low down in 
landholdings, and much worse in employment in 
private sector. The number of MLAs and MPs coming 
from this community has also been declining over 
a period of time. Of course there is one place 
where they are over-over represented and that's 
in prisons. One may add there is other data which 
tells us that their representation amongst the 
riot victims is also very heavy, more than 80% 
riot victims being Muslims and not to be left 
behind most of the POTA detainees also happen to 
be Muslims!
The biases against them abound in all spheres; 
the police machinery in particular is the biggest 
victim of these biases and prejudices. This 
becomes apparent in their role during the riots 
and after the riots.  The latest in the series is 
of course the pattern of investigations followed 
by them. By now most of those in the police 
machinery have come to firmly believe, and this 
is the basis of their ‘professional conduct', 
that Muslims are criminals. The propaganda 
emerging from some rumor manufacturing factory 
that ‘all Muslims are not terrorists but all 
terrorists are Muslims' is not only becoming part 
of social common sense but also the core guiding 
principle of investigation authorities. This 
makes their complex job also very easy. Recently 
the investigation of Mumbai bomb blasts and later 
Malegaon blast investigation has seen the 
targeting of Muslims through and through. Right 
on day next of Mumbai blasts Muslim youth were 
detained in hordes, to be released only when a 
section of the community went on protest. But the 
pattern remains the same.
While someone from top leadership of police 
issued a formal appeal that they want to play a 
fair game and are open to listen to the innocents 
if approached.  Some social workers of repute 
were also taken in by these formal appeals and 
narrated through newspaper columns as to how 
approaching police authorities is ‘working' in 
getting the innocents released. What levels of 
democracy we have reached that police will nab 
the innocents for the crime not committed by 
them, than they will ring up the top police 
officials or the reputed social worker/s to get 
themselves released.  What if the immediate 
havladar decides that you cannot use the mobile 
now, what if you are intimidated beyond your wits 
to be able to contact these worthies? The 
question remains how many from the community can 
have access to these socials workers, whatever be 
the levels of their accessibility. How many from 
community can contact the top leadership of the 
police which makes these claims? In the face of 
such massive goofs, which have been committed in 
such cases, mostly due to biased and prejudiced 
approach of authorities is there not a need for 
training the police in the lessons of pluralism 
removing their biases and prejudices if that be 
possible. Does a help line exist for an average 
person? Does not a need exist for creating an 
effective help line?
There are media reports telling us how innocents 
are being trapped in different ways during 
interrogation, what do we do for that? Do the 
people know their rights in the face of being 
apprehended by the Khaki uniforms? Is it not the 
responsibility of the state to let the people 
know their rights also when they are being booted 
and tortured to extract ‘confessions from them? 
Do we not need to have provisions that without 
the legal help to the one arrested the arresting 
authorities will not proceed with their various 
‘degree' methods of increasing levels of torture 
to force the accused speak what Khaki uniformed 
one's want to hear to make their job easy. 
Incidentally that also fits in to the scheme of 
their line of preformed opinions?
The system is so insular, and by now becoming so 
self righteous that the appeal from Prime 
Minister, not to target the particular community 
fell on deaf years of the hardened stiff collared 
khaki machinery. In Malegaon the limits of police 
bias are openly apparent. And being disgusted 
with that the local Muslim community had to 
resort to day long peaceful bandh to vent out 
their frustration and anguish. The partisanship 
of the investigation is crystal clear to those 
who have been following the incidents in 
Maharashtra. The Bajrang Dal, whose activists 
died while making bomb in Nanded, is totally 
protected by the other type of bias, ‘affirmative 
bias' to be applied to some sections and 
political streams of society. The bomb shells and 
RDX which were found in Shanker Shelke shop in 
Ahmadnagar seems to be of no relevance and it 
does not give any clues to our professionals in 
uniforms.  The sketch of the person who bought 
the cycle on which bombs were kept has been 
relegated to the background and the thesis that 
SIMI activists have done this to kill exclusive 
Muslim crowd near Bada Kabristan seems to be the 
central point of investigation as far as our 
agencies are concerned.
Is it that the sectarian ideology has already 
completed its task of ensuring that the half 
truths, half lies spread by it are the core 
operating principles of the large section of 
bureaucracy and police? The insecurity of other 
minority, the Christians, especially in Adivasi 
areas knows no bounds and through organizations 
like Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram the divisive and 
intimidating role is being carried to the full 
extent in remote places. The news of attacks on 
Christian nuns ad missionaries have become a 
matter of routine and no more has any ‘news 
value' as per the parameters of our media. At 
social and cultural level the Freedom of Religion 
Bills in various BJP ruled states are an open 
threat to the Christian missionaries working in 
the area of education and health in deep 
interiors. Madhya Pradesh government like other 
BJP governments has been manipulating the things 
at cultural level. It has been naming most of the 
social schemes in Hindu imageries, like water 
irrigation projects as Jalabhishek, marriage 
support to the poor as Kanyadan and so on. 
Gujarat as a Hindu Rashtra has already relegated 
the Muslims out into refugee camps away from the 
main areas. Is it a return of old untouchable 
ghettoes?
It seems the democratic ethos is under severe 
threat and the state of alienation of minorities 
is a pointer to that. It seems that even without 
being in power, the BJP-RSS agenda of Hindu 
Nation is already unfolding itself in a 
threatening manner in BJP ruled states and in a 
subtle and overt fashion in other states where 
BJP is not in power. In those states due to the 
communal attitude of some of those in power and 
the communalization of state apparatus, police 
and bureaucracy, the restrictions on liberal 
democratic spaces are mounting. Is it time for 
celebration in RSS headquarters or is there time 
still for it to be taken as a warning signal by 
those who wish to preserve and strengthen 
democracy. A lip service to minority welfare and 
security will not do. Those in leadership who are 
committed to the values of Liberty, Equality and 
Community (national) need to wake up and take 
stock of the all round intimidation and 
alienation of minorities. If Rajinder Sachar 
Committee report and Malegaon bandh does not wake 
them up, what will?


______


[5]

Communalism Watch
http://communalism.blogspot.com/2006/11/memories-saffronising-statues-and.html

MEMORIES, SAFFRONISING STATUES AND CONSTRUCTING COMMUNAL POLITICS

by Badri Narayan (Economic and Political Weekly, November 11, 2006)

Managing the memories of different communities 
and reinterpreting them at the local level to 
suit the logic of a particular political group, 
is an oft-observed phenomenon in the ongoing 
political processes of the country. Lesser known 
historical events associated with particular 
communities are searched out and converted into 
popular memory in a way that suits the political 
agenda of the concerned political forces. The 
article is focused on one such attempt of the 
Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh and Bharatiya Janata 
Party to search for space among the dalits of 
Uttar Pradesh by looking for heroes of their 
communities, creating warring identities against 
Muslim invaders, and relocating them in their 
broader project of constructing communal memories 
among Hindus as a whole, including the dalit 
castes.

http://www.epw.org.in/showArticles.php?root=2006&leaf=11&filename=10743&filetype=pdf

______

[6]

Communalism Watch
http://communalism.blogspot.com/2006/11/future-of-right-wing-there-and-over.html

FUTURE OF THE RIGHT WING, THERE AND OVER HERE
by Harish Khare
http://www.hindu.com/2006/11/22/stories/2006112205171000.htm

______


[7]

Mangalorean.com
Nov 20, 2006

DISCUSS MANGALORE VIOLENCE IN PARLIAMENT - TEESTHA SETHALVAD

November 19, Mangalore: The central leadership 
should be intimated about the communal violence 
that rocked Dakshina Kannada recently. The issue 
should be discussed in  winter session of the 
parliament and progressive organisations should 
play active role in this regard, said human 
rights activist and 'Communalism Combat' editor 
Teesta Setalvad.

She was speaking after inaugurating Sadbhavana 
Samavesha, a convention for communal harmony, 
organized by Komu Souharda Vedike in the City on 
Saturday.

Indians have cherished secularism as way of life 
and is enshrined in our Constitution also. 
Unfortunately politicians chant the mantra of 
secularism only during elections. In the absence 
of genuine political resistance, communal forces 
are adding to their strength. Though political 
power is one of the aim of Sangh Parivar, their 
real objective is to transform the life style and 
mind set of Indians by damaging the secular 
fabric of the Society.

With this agenda, Sangh Parivar elements began to 
infiltrate into bureaucracy, education, media and 
other realms.

Flaying the alleged police atrocity against 
innocents during the Dakshina Kannada communal 
violence, she alleged that police which enjoys 
nexus with communal elements unleashed great 
horror on women and children.

Referring to the provoking reports carried by 
some section of press during the communal 
violence, she said that public should boycott the 
newspapers having jaundiced views and lodge 
complaint with Press Council against newspapers 
carrying non-objective reports which disturbs 
social harmony.

Youths from Dalit and Backward Communities are 
falling prey to the diabolic plots of communal 
elements.

In Panchmahal district of Gujarat also vested 
interests used Backward Community youths to 
realize their ends.

Backward and Dalit communities in Karnataka have 
a rich progressive tradition and attempts to 
identify with communal elements is a betrayed to 
this rich tradition, she opined.

Speaking on the occasion Prof M Dattatreya of 
Kuvempu University hailed the entrepreneurial 
skills of Backward Communities from Coastal 
Karnataka. Communal elements are trying to lure 
these emerging communities into their trap and 
social awareness should be created in this 
regard, he added.

Komu Souharda Vedike will conduct siminar 
conventions at various district and taluk head 
quarters in the State and valedictory will be 
held in Bangalore on November 26.

A book and documentary on Mangalore communal 
violence was released on the occasion. Former MP 
Vinay Kumar Sorake, K M Sharief of Karnataka 
Forum for Dignity and others were present.


_____


[8] 

The Times of India
21 November 2006

A RAY OF HOPE
by Ratna Kapur

In Maharashtra, a domestic worker files a case of 
domestic violence against her husband who 
brutally beat her up with a steel rod and a 
brick. A government school teacher in Tamil Nadu 
files a case against her husband, a peon employed 
in the Tamil Nadu water board.

He is charged for beating up his wife with a 
stick and umbrella after a quarrel at night. 
Within days of the Protection of Women from 
Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DVA) coming into 
force, women are taking recourse to its 
provisions.

DVA represents a landmark in the achievement of 
gender equality for Indian women in two 
fundamental ways. First, it rubbishes the myth 
that the Indian family is a safe haven for all 
its members. This fact is evidenced by the broad 
range of harms covered under the new law, 
including abuse of the elderly, child sexual 
abuse, and violence against divorced or widowed 
women.

Empirical evidence of the widespread existence of 
these brutalities in the home has been available 
for years and finally found expression in law.

Second, the law delinks domestic violence from 
the confinements of dowry harassment and dowry 
murders. Until now, victims of domestic violence 
were invariably forced to link the violence to a 
demand for dowry in order to access legal 
remedies under the Indian Penal Code.

The only other option was divorce on grounds of 
cruelty. DVA provides civil law relief for 
domestic violence which is recognised as 
occurring for all sorts of reasons, across every 
class, religion and caste, in rural areas and 
urban centres.

The law has some fairly revolutionary features. 
For the first time, marital rape is legally 
recognised as a form of domestic violence. While 
cri-minal law has still not been amended to 
enable a woman to file a rape case against her 
husband or domestic sexual partner, she is now 
given access to new civil remedies, including 
securing a protection order or injunction against 
her abuser.

  DVA recognises child sexual abuse as an offence, 
and hence for the first time offers some space in 
law for the recognition of a child's rights to be 
free from violence in the home.

Domestic violence is not confined to wives, but 
includes mothers, daughters, sisters, widows, 
divorced women living in the home, as well as 
those who are in an informal relationship with 
the accused, including a bigamous relationship. 
It covers all domestic relationships in a 'shared 
household'.

A shared household is very broadly defined to 
include one where the abused person lives singly 
or with the abuser. Presumably, the Act would 
also cover a man who abuses or beats up a sex 
worker with whom he has had a long-standing 
relationship, such as a pimp, or an ongoing 
sexual relationship, though the scope of this 
provision would need to be tested in the courts.

A case can be filed against any male adult person 
as well as other relatives of the husband or male 
partner. Women are not just considered victims, 
but also can be perpetrators of violence against 
other members of the household, including 
children, the elderly and daughters-in-law.

The Act is not confined to physical violence but 
also includes verbal, emotional and economic 
violence. Verbal violence includes accusations 
against a woman's character or conduct, or 
preventing her from taking up a job or forcing 
her to leave a job, or taking away her income.

Arguably complaining against attacks on a woman's 
character would be a right equally available to a 
married woman, mistress or sex worker, if they 
fall within the definition of 'domestic 
relationship'. Insults for not having a male 
child, bringing dowry are extremely significant 
protections.

Acts that constitute emotional violence include 
not providing food, clothes, and medicines for 
one's children, preventing a child from attending 
school, college or any other educatio-nal 
institution, forcing a person to get married when 
he or she does not want to, or preventing a 
person from marrying the person of his or her 
choice.

  The fact that these acts are categorically 
described as acts of violence in the law is 
pro-bably more important in terms of their 
educative impact, than the actual prosecutions 
that will take place under these specific 
provisions.

Complaints of domestic violence can be filed by 
neighbours, social workers, or relatives on 
behalf of the victim. And the magistrate is given 
a broad array of powers, including issuing 
protection or injunction orders, providing 
monetary relief or payment maintenance.

While the penal provisions dealing with dowry 
focus on incarceration, the DVA gives women an 
opportunity to keep the perpetrator at a 
distance, but not in jail.

Women can no longer be evicted from their homes 
by the abuser, and can seek an order to reside in 
the same house or be allotted a part of it for 
her personal use even if she has no legal claim 
or share in the property. The abuser can also be 
prohibited from entering the aggrieved person's 
place of work or, if that person is a child, the 
school.

DVA covers acts that are violative of a woman's 
dignity or any other unwelcome conduct of a 
sexual nature.

In a country where sex, not just sexual violence, 
is considered bad, indecent, and something in 
which 'good people' do not indulge or talk about, 
the courts may find themselves determining 
dignity or sexuality along highly puritanical 
lines, that would neither benefit women nor be 
conducive to promoting healthy adult sexual 
relationships.

Protection from sexual wrongs needs to be 
accompanied with education about sexual rights.

The writer is director, Centre for Feminist Legal Research.

_____


[9] UPCOMING EVENTS

(i)
Invitation

This is to bring to your kind notice that one day 
national conference is being organized on the 
issue of "RIGHT TO FOOD AND RIGHT TO LIFE" 
mentioned in Indian constitution Art 21.
As you know that in spite of the buffer stock of 
food grains and available system like PDS (Public 
Distribution System), incidence of starvation 
deaths are reported from many parts of the U.P. 
and India. According to the UN Information 
Centre, New Delhi, estimated 214 million food 
insecure populations live in India, 50 million 
reside in the state of Uttar Pradesh and 50% of 
the children everywhere are undernourished and 
stunted.  Infant Mortality Rate for whole of 
India is 68 and is 72 for the state of UP that is 
primarily caused due to malnutrition and 
subsequent diseases due to micronutrient 
deficiencies. Though reports of starvation deaths 
in UP, MP, Chhatisgarh, Jharkhand, Orrisa and 
Bihar and suicides by farmers and other 
low-income population in UP, Karnataka and 
Maharashtra have become a regular feature in the 
newspapers. Governments are not recognizing 
starvation and hunger. The reason can partially 
be the lack of a proper definition of starvation 
and partially the lack of maintenance of records 
or data regarding starvation.
Even after intervention of the Hon' able Supreme 
Court, the situation has not much improved. In 
this regard a case is already pending in the apex 
court .The apex court has also issued interim 
orders to check the starvation deaths and 
effectively implementation of all welfare schemes 
for the poor. In this regard FIAN Norway and 
FIAN- UP are jointly organizing a conference on 
"Right to Food and Right to Life". In this 
context, you are requested at the conference as 
guest of honour.We have received confirmation 
from many distinguished guests such as Ms.Kristin 
Kjaeret and Mr.Trond from Norway,Mr.Ravi P 
Verma,MP,Loksabha,Dr.EMS Natchiappan,MP Rajya 
Sabha and Chairman Parlimetary Standing Commettee 
on Public Grievances,Law and Justice. A line 
regarding your participation would be highly 
appreciated the venue and time of the conference 
is as follows:

Venue-          Ravindralaya
Opposite Lucknow Railway Station,
Charbagh, Lucknow.
Date:               26th November.
Time:               10 am to 2 pm. 

Looking forward to hearing from you.

With kind regards,!

Anuj Tiwari
Programme In charge
FIAN-Uttar Pradesh
12/597,Indira Nagar
Lucknow-226016,Tel. 0522 2349556

___

(ii)

CONFERENCE ON PEOPLE'S FOREIGN POLICY: 7 - 8 DECEMBER 2006
Cama Hall, Fort, Mumbai, India

The perceptible shift in India's Foreign Policy 
over the recent years towards closer strategic 
ties with the US and Israel, has created an 
urgent need for all progressive forces to come 
together to examine, critique and counter the 
sinister dimensions of such a shift and also work 
out and offer an alternative people's foreign 
policy geared towards the goal of creating a just 
and peaceful world.

The Indo-US nuclear deal, India's stand vis-à-vis 
Iran's nuclear programme, its increasing 
cooperation with the apartheid state of Israel, 
together with the consequent abandonment of the 
long-standing support to the Palestinian quest 
for an independent nation, epitomise a betrayal 
of India's claims of having a sovereign and 
independent foreign policy.

India's increasing military ties with the USA, 
joint military exercises, its emergence as the 
biggest arms purchaser from Israel and its 
ill-concealed ambitions to emerge as a regional 
hegemon basking in the reflected glory of the 
global hegemon, will have serious ramifications 
not only on India's independent and sovereign 
status but also for all of Asia in terms of its 
security, trade and development. Last but not the 
least, this is a setback to the process of both 
regional and global disarmament.

  Hence, there is a strong need to take stock of 
the evolution of India's Foreign Policy so far 
and also to demystify and decode the concept of 
"Foreign Policy" so as to bring it into the 
domain of "people's politics".

It bears reiteration that the Foreign Policy of a 
country impacts the lives of ordinary people in a 
number of ways. 'War' is of course the most 
evident and extreme example. But then, 
immigration policy, international trade treaties, 
defence deals in the global market and even 
nuclear policy are   all closely intertwined with 
the Foreign Policy, and seriously impact the 
lives of common people. So there is an immediate 
need for a wider engagement and debate on the 
issues concerned.

It is precisely in this context, that the 
Citizens Against War and Occupation - an 
all-India body, has decided to have an 
international conference on "People's Foreign 
Policy" in Mumbai from 7 - 8 December 2006 .

The main themes of the conference will include 
opposition to US hegemony (including discussions 
on WMDs and the 'Global War on Terror'), crises 
in West and Central Asia, South Asian issues like 
nuclearisation, militarisation and ongoing 
conflicts, economic dimensions of the Foreign 
Policy, evolution of India's Foreign Policy, etc.

This conference is meant to be not an end in 
itself but a launching pad for a sustained 
nationwide campaign. The idea is to have a series 
of meetings in many more cities and regions 
capitalising on the momentum generated by the 
conference. Participants are expected from India 
and its neighbours and as well as from West Asia, 
including   resource persons like Kalpana Sharma, 
Aijaz Ahmed, Bhadrakumar, Chaudhury Manzoor 
Ahmed, M.V. Ramana, Farhad Mazhar, Arjun Karki, 
Achin Vanaik, Anuradha Chenoy, Kamal Chenoy, 
Karamat Ali, Asim Roy, Pallab Sen Gupta, Mazher 
Hussain, Christopher Fonseca, Gautam Navlakha and 
others

  All those activists, individuals, political 
parties, socio-political movements, civil society 
organisations and groups that are in opposition 
to India's strategic alliance with Israel and the 
United States and therefore support their 
unconditional and immediate withdrawal from 
Central and West Asia are invited to attend and 
be a part of this conference and collective 
endeavour .

We expect that that this conference will be a 
landmark attempt on the part of the people's 
movements and progressive political forces to 
forge a meaningful alliance to stake their 
rightful claim in formulating a people-oriented 
foreign policy for our country. We hope to have 
you amongst us on both the days and actively 
participate in the debates that ensue, thus 
providing the necessary intellectual and 
political impetus to the anti-war movement world 
over. 

  A limited number of accommodations will be 
available to the delegates on the first come 
first served basis.

For further information on programme and venue 
please contact on the below mentioned address or 
email id.

-----------------------------------------------------

  Citizens against war and occupation

All India Federation for Trade Union, All India 
Peace & Solidarity Organisation, All India Trade 
Union Congress, All India Youth Federation, 
Coalition for Nuclear Disarmament & Peace, COVA, 
Delhi Science Forum, Development Research & 
Action, Focus on the Global South, Henrich Boll 
Foundation, Indian Social Action Forum, Indian 
Social Institute, Lok Raj Sangathan, NAPM, 
National Federation of Indian Women, Nirantar, 
People's Union for Civil Liberties, Popular 
Education & Action Centre, SAMA (Resource Centre 
for Women & Health), SEEDS, SEWA, Third World 
Studies Centre, VISION, NTUI, PEACE MUMBAI

Local Hosts: PEACE MUMBAI

AIPSO, BUILD,  New Trade Union Initiative (NTUI), 
PEACE,  COVA,  Yuva Bharat,  CEHAT, Salokha , 
Vidrohi,  Action Aid International, Shodhan 
Weekly, , Peoples' Media Initiative, Communist 
Party of India (CPI), Communist Party of India 
Marxist (CPM), Jan Morcha,Coalition for Nuclear 
Disarmament and Peace (CNDP), National Alliance 
of Peoples Movements (NAPM), India Center for 
Human Rights and Law (ICHRL), Asia South Pacific 
Bureau for Adult Education (ASPBAE), Youth for 
Unity and Voluntary Action (YUVA), National Youth 
Federation (NYF), Pakistan-India Peoples Forum 
for Peace and Democracy (PIPFPD), Bombay Urban 
Industrial League for Development (BUILD), Focus 
on the Global South, India, Indo-Pak Youth Forum 
for Peace, Media for People, Vikas Adhyayan 
Kendra (VAK), Akshara, Documentation Research and 
Training Center (DRTC), Explorations, Initiative, 
Institute For Community Organization and Research 
(ICOR), Movement for Peace and Justice (MPJ), 
Jamaat-e-Islami Hind, Bombay Aman Committee.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Citizens Against War and Occupation, C/o. Focus 
on the Global South, India, A - 201, Kailash 
Apartments, Juhu Church Road, Juhu,, Mumbai - 400 
049. India
Tel : +91-22-6592 1141 / 51, Telefax : 
+91-22-2625 4347 , Email : peacemumbai at gmail.com



_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

Buzz on the perils of fundamentalist politics, on
matters of peace and democratisation in South
Asia. SACW is an independent & non-profit
citizens wire service run since 1998 by South
Asia Citizens Web: www.sacw.net/
SACW archive is available at: bridget.jatol.com/pipermail/sacw_insaf.net/

DISCLAIMER: Opinions expressed in materials carried in the posts do not
necessarily reflect the views of SACW compilers.



More information about the SACW mailing list