SACW | 30 May 2006 | Sri Lanka: Failed State ?; Sri Lanka -India -UK: State and Non State Censorship
Harsh Kapoor
aiindex at mnet.fr
Mon May 29 21:19:37 CDT 2006
South Asia Citizens Wire | 30 May, 2006 | Dispatch No. 2253
[1] Sri Lanka:
(i) Sri Lanka: A Failed State? (N Shanmugaratnam)
(ii) Free Media Movement Press Release re President's order
ban the film "The Da Vinci Code"
[2] India: Far right's war on a film (J Sri Raman)
[3] UK: Yet again we cave into religious bigots. And this time
they're Hindus (Nick Cohen)
+ Letter to the Editor, The Guardian: Reinstate Indian art exhibition
(Chetan Bhatt, Rajeswari Sunderrajan, Priyamvada Gopal
[4] Chobi Mela IV: International Festival of Photography 2006: Call
for Entries
[5] Publications:
(i) Stories are invited for the upcoming Zubaan Book of New
Writing by Young Women
(ii) Book review: Blood Brothers By M.J. Akbar - reviewed by Ashok Mitra
(iii) INSAF Bulletin 50 - June 2006
___
[1] Sri Lanka
(i)
SRI LANKA - A FAILED STATE?
By Prof. N Shanmugaratnam (May 18, 2006)
Sri Lanka has been ranked 25, between Rwanda and Ethiopia, on the
list of Failed States Index (FSI) as computed by the US based Foreign
Policy & Fund For Peace. Sri Lanka is one of the 28 countries in the
red 'Alert' segment headed by Sudan. Norway is at the other end of
the list of 146 countries and hence the world's best performer in
terms of the Index. The FSI is an aggregate of scores for twelve
criteria derived from a liberal democratic concept of the state. It
is not the purpose of this essay to go into the merit of each of the
criteria or into the validity of the statistical procedure.
Moreover, it needs to be said that, beyond the rankings according to
a common set of criteria, the FS indices are not useful for
comparisons of state building in different countries, as each
national case has to be seen in its historical context and with
reference to its location in the changing global political
environment. Just recall, for instance, the diversities in the
historical, geopolitical and global contexts of state formation in
Western Europe, former colonies in the 'Third World' and in the
former Soviet bloc countries. The FSI offers a simple aggregate
statistical statement of some key internal conditions at a given
point in time. It says nothing about history or the powerful external
pressures on national state building in today's world. It can be
dismissed with justification as an ideologically motivated construct
meant to serve the imperial project of neoliberal hegemony.
However, the FSI list is not without value. In my view, it is worth
considering the overall finding that many states in the 'Third World'
have failed or are failing in terms of some basic conditions for
successful capitalist state building in today's global environment.
These conditions, if I may take the liberty to choose, include the
monopoly on violence, genuine control over the territory formally
recognised as belonging to the state and over the people living
there, guarantees of basic freedoms and protection of citizens'
rights, economic and social development and basic human welfare. One
can address these conditions with reference to Sri Lanka without
being restricted by the FSI framework, even by rejecting it
altogether. I think the FSI report has, at least, given us an
opportunity to look at the state of state building in Sri Lanka.
The Lankan state has lost its monopoly on violence and its
sovereignty has been effectively challenged by the LTTE in parts of
the north and east of the country. Closely and causally related to
the armed conflict are the communalisation of the polity and the
desecularisation of the state in a multi-ethnic, multi-religious
country. The internal war, which has been going on for more than two
decades, has caused massive loss of lives and assets and left
hundreds of thousands displaced. It has caused more divisions,
generated new grievances and conflicts, and rendered the national
question more intractable. Successive governments have been callously
indifferent to the indignities suffered by the Tamil speaking people
due to the lack of enforcement of their language rights. These rights
exist only on paper. A government, which spends in billions to fight
the LTTE, has not bothered to create a functioning machinery for the
implementation of Tamil as an official language. If this is not
discrimination, what is it? Can the Tamils be faulted for having lost
faith in such a government and in the majoritarian unitary state?
Lanka's law and order machinery has been progressively weakened due
to corruption and politicisation and its legitimacy is highly eroded.
The human rights record is poor and disappearances and extra judicial
killings are again on the rise as this is being written. Development
continues to be socially and geographically uneven. The state has not
been able to play a developmental role in the sense of enabling an
inclusive economic transformation and social advancement. It has
simply shifted from an interventionism that lacked a transformative
developmental vision to a total submission to the neoliberal
conditionalities of the international financial institutions (IFIs).
Sri Lanka had missed an opportunity to put to good use the human
capital it had created through free healthcare and education in the
early decades after independence.
Meanwhile, the country remains highly dependent on foreign aid even
after three decades of economic liberalisation under the tutelage of
the IFIs. Even worse, the overall rate of absorption of foreign aid
does not exceed 20 percent (Institute of Policy Studies). The rate of
utilisation of tsunami aid is pathetically lower than this at 13.5
percent (Auditor General's office). Government leaders often mention
the war as the major cause of the poor development record. But they
have not been able to find a political solution to bring the war to
an end. This would involve a fundamental restructuring of the state
to enable reunification through power sharing and that calls for a
leadership with the political will to do it. We do not seem to be
anywhere close to such a solution and the country is sliding back
into war.
In these circumstances, it will be hard not to conclude that Sri
Lanka's project in post-colonial state building has failed in some
basic respects and that the failure to build a Lankan society based
on an overarching Lankan identity has been the biggest failure of
all. Sadly the political elite that shaped state formation had a
different notion of a 'Lankan nation' as they were committed to the
creation of a state that is Sinhala Buddhist both in character and
appearance.
Perhaps those ultranationalist allies of the government who are for a
military solution believe that war is the best way to finish the
unfinished business of building a unitary Sinhala Buddhist state and
for the state to regain its monopoly on violence. The Liberation
Tigers are responding in the same language - a final war to complete
the secession. I am no military expert but many experts seem to think
that war will not lead to either of these outcomes but to a
prolongation of the agony of the people and to a deeper crisis for
the unitary state. I am deeply convinced that reviving the peace
process is the first step towards a solution. The solution may be
miles away but a long march to a durable peace through negotiations
is better than a protracted war of mutual annihilation.
Dr. N. Shanmugaratnam is Professor of Development Studies and Head of
Research, at Department of International Environment & Development
Studies, Norwegian University of Life Sciences
o o o
(ii)
PRESIDENT ORDERS REVIEW BOARD TO BAN FILM "THE DA VINCI CODE"
The following is an FMM press release:
The Free Media Movement wishes to express its concern regarding a
decision by the President to order the Public Performances Board to
ban the film "The Da Vinci Code", as reported in the "Daily News" on
25 May 2006.
The report goes on to say that this move is in response to an appeal
by the Catholic Bishops' Conference.
In principle, the FMM is opposed to all forms of censorship that
restrict the freedom of expression.
Throughout the world, the issue of censorship is one that is
extremely contentious. Guidelines to prevent the exposure of children
to scenes that may have an adverse impact on their development as
well as to prevent the depiction of extreme violence and brutality
are present in almost every country. However, these guidelines are
almost always implemented through a legal mechanism, such as a Board
of Censors or a Public Performance Board, such as we have in Sri
Lanka. The existence of such a mechanism provides accountability and
also avenues for redress for those who may feel their artistic
freedom has been curtailed by the decision to restrict viewing of
certain public performances for children.
In this context, a decision by the President to "order" the Public
Performances Board, which is mandated by an Act of Parliament to
carry out its mandate in reviewing every public performance and in
granting certification for universal or restricted performance, to
ban any public performance, is a serious challenge to existing legal
norms and standards in Sri Lanka.
We urge the President to call on the Public Performances Board to
carry out its mandate by reviewing the film The Da Vinci Code" when
it is due for screening in Sri Lanka and then take a decision
according to the powers vested in it through the Public Performances
Act and according to the guidelines it has developed for its
effective functioning.
We also urge the President, the Public Performances Board and the
general public to understand the principles of freedom of expression
that underlie the decisions of the governments of India and Thailand,
our closest neighbours, to permit the public screening of the film
"The Da Vinci Code" following intense debate and legal and moral
arguments.
MORE INFORMATION:
For further information, contact the Free Media Movement, 237/22,
Wijeya Kumaratunga Road, Colombo 05, Sri Lanka, tel: +94 777 312 457
/ +94 11 257 3439, fax: +94 11 471 4460
____
[2]
Daily Times
May 29, 2006
FAR RIGHT'S WAR ON A FILM
by J Sri Raman
The religious garb of the far right never concealed its real aims.
Behind its divisive communalism lay a design for destructive
"development", with no place for the people or peace. The BJP and the
parivar may have acted as censors of anti-Hindutva films in the past,
but they now seek a mob-imposed ban on films made by anyone who mocks
the idea of "development"
This is not the first time the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has risen
in furious revolt against a film. The party and the rest of the
parivar (the far-right "family") as well as its allies, have
periodically sought to empower themselves by waging a war on the most
popular products of mass entertainment. The offensive unleashed on
Aamir Khan's Fanaa, however, is different. It adds a new dimension,
in fact, to the cultural crusade of India's far right.
Before we come to that, a word about the victim of the current
campaign. Aamir Khan, who perhaps needs no introduction to Pakistani
readers, is an actor of proven and acknowledged calibre. I am no
uncritical admirer of his films, especially the bunch produced in his
activist phase of the past few years, and I am not alone. Many like
myself have enjoyed his Lagaan, Mangal Pande and pre-Fanaa
blockbuster Rang De Basanti, thought we still entertain reservations
about each.
Lagaan is about a tribal community that scores a point over the
colonial British by winning a cricket match. Not all would have
agreed with the assumption that the White Sahibs played cricket when
it came to empire building. Quite a few might have also found
unacceptable the social comment of the scenes in which an untouchable
finds a place in the tribal team solely for his handicap that makes
him a tricky spinner.
Even more problematic is the sub-theme in Mangal Pande - named after
a hero of the Sepoy Mutiny or India's First War of Independence
(1857) - about a literally kicked-about untouchable joining the
larger anti-colonial front.
Thematic, too, is the flaw in Rang De Basanti that marred it somewhat
for many of us. The climax where a band of youth rouses a whole
country (or at least its middle class) into an anti-establishment
revolt might have been more rousing if the catalyst had been
different. The youth and the larger public in the film were outraged
not at any atrocity carried out against people but by the death of an
air force pilot in a peace-time accident, described as his supreme
sacrifice "for his country".
None of this, however, ever bothered the BJP or the parivar. It is
not Fanaa, a film with a Kashmiri backdrop, that has provoked the
wrath of the far right. The film is being punished for Aamir's
support for the agitation for the rehabilitation of the people whose
homes and livelihoods are threatened by a giant dam project. In the
Gujarat of the infamous Narendra Modi, who is as proud of the pogrom
of 2002 as of the multi-billion-rupee Narmada dam project, the film
faces a virtual indefinite ban.
Aamir, to his great credit, has refused to buckle under pressure. He
has refused to apologise for "speaking for rehabilitation of the
poor". In the process, he has made a point more forcefully than any
of his films.
The far right has taken on films before, but culture policing of this
kind was, in every instance, is very much a part of its communal
campaign. One of the ugliest examples was the fiercely violent
prevention of the screening of courageous filmmaker Deepa Mehta's
Fire. The 1996 film about a lesbian couple was attacked not merely
for offending a code of morality but even more for allegedly
maligning the majority community of India. The common Indian names of
Sita and Radha, given to the couple, were seen as proof of an
anti-majority conspiracy.
Said Balasaheb Thackeray of the Shiv Sena, which provided muscle to
the BJP campaign in Mumbai: "We would have no problem, if the names
had been Shabana, Saira, or Najma." His first two references were,
respectively, to left-leaning actor-activist Shabana Azmi and to
former star Saira Bano, wife of Dilip Kumar, a persona non grata with
the parivar ever since he received an official award from Pakistan.
We do not know whether the third could have been a reference to Najma
Heptullah, formerly a Congress leader and a deputy chairperson of the
Rajya Sabha (the Upper House of India's parliament) who is now a
largely-silent BJP luminary.
Deepa Mehta was in trouble again four years later over her Water -
and her allegedly anti-Hindutva ways. Set in the 1930s, against the
backdrop of India's freedom struggle, the film portrayed the plight
of a group of widows forced into poverty at a temple in the holy city
of Varanasi. It told the tale of a relationship between a widow and a
follower of Mahatma Gandhi. Thackeray must have just forgotten to ask
why Deepa did not make her film about a widow of foreign origin!
The communal thrust of the far right's cultural crusades has hardly
ever been concealed. It has not been, for example, in the continuing
campaign against MF Husain for painting female Hindu deities in
violation of a dress code - one that devoutly adoring temple
sculptors down the centuries knew nothing about. Similar is the
thrust of the campaign against the Valentine's Day, vilified as a
baneful influence of the Christian West.
The anti-Aamir offensive is different because it does not target an
allegedly anti-Hindutva force or film. It only carries forward the
campaign against indomitable woman activist Medha Patkar and others
who have raised their voice against the mass deprivation that
Narmada-like "development" projects mean if implemented in a
Modi-like manner. Some observers also mention the actor's religion
and his recent remarks about the latest round of riots in Gujarat's
Vadodara, but these do not figure in the slogans against Aamir.
Initially, the campaign was given a regional complexion. Aamir was
accused of offending Gujarati asmita (pride), no less. The BJP is
trying now, however, to make it an all-India campaign, with
demonstrators protecting the endangered "pride" by burning the
actor's effigies and the film's posters in cities of other states
like Madhya Pradesh and Bihar as well.
The religious garb of the far right never concealed its real aims.
Behind its divisive communalism lay a design for destructive
"development", one with nationalist pretensions but no place for the
people or peace. The BJP and the parivar may have acted as censors of
anti-Hindutva films in the past, but they now seek a mob-imposed ban
on films made by anyone who mocks the idea of "development" through
dams that drown people and demands that they sink without a trace or
troublesome protest.
The writer is a journalist based in Chennai, India. A peace activist,
he has contributed the main essay to "The Media Bomb," a study of
Indian media responses to India's nuclear-weapon tests of 1998. He is
also the author of a sheaf of poems under the title 'At Gunpoint'
____
[3]
The Observer
May 28, 2006
YET AGAIN WE CAVE INTO RELIGIOUS BIGOTS. AND THIS TIME THEY'RE HINDUS
Nick Cohen
The Satanic Verses, Behzti, Theo van Gogh's Submission, Jerry
Springer: The Opera, the Danish cartoons of Muhammad ... now we can
add the London exhibition of the work of Maqbool Fida Husain to the
rapidly expanding list of works of art and satire targeted by
militant religion.
For readers interested in Indian culture, the show at the Asia House
gallery in the West End's fine art district should have been
essential viewing. Husain is the grand old man of Indian art. He
began as a boy painting cinema hoardings for six annas per square
foot before getting his first break at the Bombay Art Society in
1947. His international appeal lies in his mixing of classical
traditions with modern styles. Art from all over the world inspires
him - Emil Nolde and Oskar Kokoschka were early influences - but you
only have to glance at his pictures to know an Indian must have
painted them.
The Indian High Commissioner, Kamalesh Sharma, claimed at the opening
that Husain was India's greatest modern artist. The exhibition was to
run until August, to allow visitors to decide for themselves if he
was right.
They won't be able to now. Asia House closed the show on Monday after
threats of violence from anonymous Hindu fundamentalists. Arjun Malik
of the Hindu Human Rights campaign assured me they had nothing to do
with him, but said his group had been willing to do everything short
of violence to stop the public seeing two of Husain's works.
His supporters had already deluged the gallery with letters, phone
calls and emails complaining that Husain's 'so-called art' offended
the 'sentiments of the Hindu community of the UK'. (Whether it did is
debatable, as no one has elected the Hindu Human Rights campaign to
represent the Hindu or any other community.) The protesters also went
for Hitachi, which had given Asia House plasma TV screens, and
demanded public apologies from everyone involved, including the
Indian High Commissioner.
They called off a planned demonstration in London yesterday because,
like the managers of the Birmingham Repertory Theatre who closed
Behzti after the demonstrations by conservative Sikhs and the
national newspaper editors who refused to publish the Danish
cartoons, Asia House buckled under the pressure to censor.
The apparently separate protests from different faiths are connected.
What we are seeing is rival fundamentalists egging each other on in a
politics of competitive grievance. Every time one secures a victory,
the others realise they can't be left behind. If satirists are
frightened of having a go at Islam because they believe they may be
killed - and they are - why shouldn't Christian fundamentalists
decide to become more menacing?
A comedian who takes a pop at the Pope sends the subliminal message:
'We can deride your religion as despicable because we know you are
not so despicable you will resort to violence.' There is a limit to
how long the ultras for any religion will put up with that before
they change the ground rules.
After abusive Sikh men closed Behzti, Gurpreet Kaur Bhatti's play
about the abuse of Sikh women by Sikh men, Christian Voice upped the
ante against Jerry Springer: The Opera. It had previously run at the
National Theatre for months without attracting protest. But when BBC2
came to broadcast it, London Christians imitated Birmingham Sikhs and
BBC executives suddenly needed the protection of private security
guards.
You can see the same pattern in the hounding of MF Husain. The
paintings the demonstrators targeted were nudes of the Hindu
goddesses Draupadi and Durga. Arjun Malik went into all kinds of
verbal convolutions when I asked what he had against them, before
coming out with the explanation that 'according to tradition, they
should not be disrobed'. The reason for the tongue-twisting is that
nude gods and goddesses have been a part of the Indian tradition for
5,000 years. As Husain said: 'Here, the nudity is not nakedness; it
is a form of innocence and maturity.'
It is no longer innocent because, after the state-sponsored violence
of the Danish cartoon protests, Hindus from the religious Indian
right looked around for a grievance of their own. They picked on
Husain - the fact that he was born a Muslim made him a natural target
- and began a confessional arms race. In February, a Muslim
politician in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh offered a large
reward to anyone who beheaded the Danish cartoonists. A Hindu
politician responded by saying he would pay the same to anyone who
would kill Husain.
What is depressing is that, apart from a letter to the Guardian, from
Lord Meghnad Desai, the closure of a major exhibition by fanatics has
passed without comment. British troops are fighting against forces
motivated by the religious fervour of the ultra right. British police
officers arrest suspects they claim are inspired to kill because
they, too, have a psychotic religious mission. Yet every week,
comedians, art gallery owners, TV producers, newspaper editors and
Home Office ministers give in to religious extremists. This is no way
to win a war.
o o o
The Guardian
May 30, 2006
Letters
REINSTATE INDIAN ART EXHIBITION
As scholars of south Asia and its rich traditions of artistic,
social, religious
and political expression, we condemn the forced closure of the exhibition of
works by renowned Indian artist MF Husain at Asia House in London,
following harassment by groups claiming to represent Hindus (Letters, May
26). Groups such as Hindu Human Rights and the Hindu Forum of Britain
are wielding the same tactics used by organisations in India. These groups
are known for repeatedly attacking the works of artists and intellectuals,
undermining India's constitutional right to freedom of thought and
expression.
The Hindu Forum of Britain and Hindu Human Rights accuse Asia House of
not "consulting" with them before putting on the exhibition. Consultation
should not be a requirement for artistic expression.
These are unelected groups, not known for consulting democratically with
the community before putting pressure on others in the name of Hinduism.
Their actions would not be sanctioned by most Hindus. Hindu traditions
have an extensive history of diverse representations of deities, include
nude and erotic images of gods and goddesses. Hinduism has never
possessed a concept of censorship of the kind that these authoritarian
groups wish to promote. We urge Asia House to reopen this exhibition - by
doing so it will honour the rich and diverse traditions of expression arising
from Hinduism and from India.
Dr Chetan Bhatt
Goldsmiths College, London
Prof Rajeswari Sunderrajan
Oxford University
Dr Priyamvada Gopal
Cambridge University
_____
[4]
CHOBI MELA IV
INTERNATIONAL FESTIVAL OF PHOTOGRAPHY 2006
This Year's Theme
BOUNDARIES
Call For Entry
Submission Deadline: 22nd July 2006
She packed her load of firewood onto the crowded train in Pangsha.
The morning sun peered through the lazy winter haze. The vendors
called 'chai garam, boildeem' and the train slowly chugged out of the
station, people still clambering on board, or finishing last minute
transactions. Some saying farewell. The scene had probably not been
very different a hundred years ago. Maybe then, they carried pan in
place of firewood, or some other commodity that people at the other
end needed. She would come back the same day, bringing back what was
needed here. Only today she was a smuggler. The artificial and
somewhat random lines drawn by a British lawyer had made her an
outlaw. She was crossing boundaries. There were other boundaries to
cross. The job a woman was allowed to do, the class signs on the
coaches that she could not read but was constantly made aware of. The
changing light and the smells as sheet (winter) went into boshonto
(spring). The Ashar clouds that the photographers waited for, which
seemed to wait until the light was right.
Rickshaw wallas find circuitous routes to take passengers across the
VIP road. Their tenuous existence made more difficult by the fact
that permits are difficult to get, and the bribes now higher. Hip hop
music in trendy discos in Gulshan and Banani with unwritten but
clearly defined dress codes make space for the yuppie elite of Dhaka.
The Baul Mela in Kushtia draws a somewhat different crowd. Ecstasy
and Ganja breaks down some barriers while music creates the bonding.
Lalon talks of other boundaries, of body and soul, the bird and the
cage.
Photography creates its own compartments. The photojournalist, the
fine artist, the well paid celebrity, the bohemian dreamer, the
purist, the pragmatist, the classical, the hypermodern, the uncropped
image, the setup shot, the Gettys and the Driks. The majority world.
The South. The North. The West. The developing world. Red filters,
green filters, high pass filters, layers, masks, feathered edges. No
photoshop, yes photoshop. Canonites, Nikonites, Leicaphytes, digital,
analogue.
The digital divide. The haves, the have nots. Vegetarians, vegans,
carnivores. Heterosexuals, metrosexuals, transsexuals, homosexuals.
The straight, the kinky. The visionaries, the mercenaries, the crude
the erudite, the pensive the flamboyant. Oil, gas, bombs, immigration
officials. WTO, subsidies, sperm banks, kings, tyrants, presidents,
prime ministers, revolutionaries, terrorists, anarchists, activists,
pacifists, the weak, the meek, the strong, the bully. The good the
evil. The hawks the doves. The evolutionists, the creationists. The
crusaders the Jihadis. The raised fist, the clasped palms. The
defiant, the oppressive, the green, the red. The virgin.
Whether cattle are well fed, or children go hungry, whether bombs are
valid for defence, or tools of aggression, boundaries - seen and
unseen - define our modes of conduct, our freedoms, our values, our
very ability to recognise the presence of the boundaries that bind us.
Shahidul Alam
Festival Director
_______________________________________
Photo practitioners are invited to submit work on the theme
"Boundaries" for Chobi Mela IV, and encouraged to explore the
boundaries of their medium.
Submissions are invited for Chobi Mela IV. Last date for submissions
22th July 2006. Participants will be notified by email on the 7th
August 2006.
GUIDELINES
Chobi Mela IV will be launched on the 9th November 2006. The theme of
the festival is "Boundaries".
Following are guidelines for submission:
Apart from the group exhibitions where work from a number of
countries will be included, collective works from other countries are
also welcome, some work has already been commissioned for the
festival. Photographers, whether they be fine artists, documentary
photographers, or from any other field of photography can participate
individually or in groups. Non-photographic work that has a direct
relevance to the theme of the festival may also be acceptable. The
festival will feature:
Exhibitions (solo/collective):
Audio-visual presentations
Workshops:
Discussions/Seminars/Lectures
Lectures:
Presentations by Picture Libraries/Agencies
Review of image-related publications:
Publication ceremony
Product Demonstrations:
Film-shows
Video Conferences:
Display/ Sales stalls
Chobi Mela retains the right to publish photographs and text from
shows selected for exhibit in promotional material relating to the
festival. Such content will not be used in any other form, unless
specifically authorized by the artist as in the case of the calendar.
People interested in participating can apply in the following methods:
Analogue Submission
(Submissions by mail to be sent to:
Secretariat
Chobi Mela IV
Drik Picture Library Ltd.
House 58, Road 15A (New)
Dhanmondi Residential Area
Dhaka 1209, Bangladesh)
or, Online Submission (http://www.chobimela.org/artistlogin.php).
Further Information:
Selections will be completed and selected participants informed (by
email) on the 7th August 2006. Participants will be able to continue
working, but will need to submit camera ready artwork or high
resolution digital files suitable for printing, by the 21st August
2006.
Chobi Mela does not sponsor shows and no fees are paid to artists.
However for work that is selected, Chobi Mela will organize gallery
space and an opening reception. Chobi Mela will also publish a
catalogue and poster for the entire festival which will feature all
participating artists. It will also organize advertising in print and
electronic media. Selected exhibitions will be toured
internationally. Through our partnership with the global television
company PEN, Chobi Mela will receive extensive coverage worldwide.
The presence of local media partners also ensure extensive coverage
in local media.
Please let us know whether you would be interested in:
Your exhibition (if selected) to be toured internationally
Your photographs (if selected) to be featured in the Drik Calendar
2007, featuring work by Chobi Mela artists. You will be provided 10
complementary copies of the calendar as honorarium.
____
[5] PUBLICATIONS
o o o
(i)
Dear All,
Zubaan is planning to produce an anthology of short fiction
showcasing new, young women writers from South Asia. Given below are
the details.
We look forward to receiving your stories!
Cheers,
JAYA BHATTACHARJI
For ZUBAAN
The Zubaan Book of New Writing by Young Women
(working title only)
Concept note
Zubaan is planning to produce an anthology of short fiction
showcasing new, young women writers from South Asia.
The criteria
* The focus of the book will be on young writers in the 20s and 30s.
* The writers should be women of South Asian extraction, but may be
based anywhere in the world. We are interested in non-resident Indian
writers as well as those based in India.
* Stories can be of any length up, ideally anywhere between 2-5,000
words and should be complete stand-alone narratives.
* All submissions must be in English.
* The anthology will be of fictional writing, and we are keen to
include a variety of genres - from humourous pieces to science
fiction, fantasy, detective stories, and other forms which may fall
under the general rubric of 'speculative fiction'.
* Preference will be given to unpublished stories. Please submit only
one story.
Selection
Selection will be on merit, and the stories would be read by Zubaan's
in-house editorial team. The final selection for inclusion would rest
with the Editor.
Submission
Complete stories should be sent as word attachments to:
zubaanwbooks at vsnl.net
contact at zubaanbooks.com
anitaroy1000 at yahoo.co.uk
with the subject line Submission for Young Writers Anthology.
Along with the story, writers should email a short biography about
themselves, including details of their published writings (if any).
Publication
Responsibility for the editing, design, production and sales of the
book rests with the Publishers.
Copyright for individual pieces would rest with the respective
authors, but rights in the anthology as a whole would rest with the
publishers, who will actively pursue the sale of translation and
co-publication rights for the book.
Payment
All writers selected will receive a modest fee for their work.
Deadline
All submissions should be received by July 31 st 2006
About Zubaan
Zubaan is a small independent feminist publisher, based in New Delhi.
Headed by Urvashi Butalia, who co-founded India's first feminist
press, Kali for Women, Zubaan is committed to publishing books by,
for, on or about women - and women's issues - in South Asia for an
international market. For further details, and a list of books
published thus far, please refer to: www.zubaanbooks.com.
o o o
(ii)
The Telegraph
May 12, 2006
HOME AGAIN
- Remembering Telinipara
As a young man
Blood Brothers By M.J. Akbar, Roli, Rs 395
Heart-rending, heart-warming fiction, or hard history? Telinipara,
around which this moving family chronicle unfolds, is of course no
imaginary spot. It is in West Bengal, a couple of miles off
Chandernagore, abutting the river Hooghly. The story begins with the
famine in Bihar in the 1870s. It wipes off an entire village. A
teenager, Prayaag, somehow survives the blight and takes an
east-bound train. He lands in Telinipara, mostly consisting of ragged
dwellings of workers employed by the Victoria Jute Mills. The
workers, mostly from Bihar and the United Provinces, belong to both
communities. The boy is taken in by Wali Mohammad, who runs a small
eatery-cum-tea stall. Wali's wife is childless, and mothers the
orphan; she becomes Mai to him. Wali's business looks up, Prayaag
learns the tricks of the trade, he is diligent and loyal. When Wali
dies, Prayaag assumes charge of the business, expands it and
gradually discovers prosperity. Mai has chosen a Muslim girl for him.
Prayaag agrees to conversion and marriage. He is now Rahmatullah.
Rahmat quietly takes to Muslim religiosity. It could be because of
his growing affluence, or his piety, that he draws around him friends
and admirers from both communities. As the narrative proceeds,
characters jostle for attention. Rahmat is intensely devoted to a
wisdom-laden ascetic, who emerges as a sort of guardian angel for
Telinipara. Others in Rahmat's circle include a gatekeeper, a coolie
sardar, a greengrocer, a school teacher, a part-time intellectual who
is a great lover of poetry too, the owner of a sweet shop, a milkman,
similar types who are attracted to goodness because they themselves
are of innate good nature.
Blood Brothers leads us through the late decades of the 19th century
and the early decades of the 20th: the plague of 1890, the First
World War, the Khilafat movement and Gandhiji's arrival on the scene,
the hopes and frustrations over the Gandhi-Jinnah parleys. The
ripples of big events reach Telinipara in slow motion but fail to
disturb its equilibrium. Evil elements from both communities are on
the prowl; Rahmatullah and his group, ever on the alert, fight back,
more or less successfully. Things look hunky-dory till the late
Forties. Mai's adopted son has meanwhile become a substantial man of
property, and builds the first pucca structure in Telinipara. His
son, Akbar Ali - the answer, Rahmat firmly believes, to his prayer at
Nizamuddin Aulia's shrine - learns English, is fond of English
clothes and is friendly with the young Scot sahibs working for the
jute mill. The narrative is a little vague regarding Akbar Ali's
professional interests; his father, one has to assume, grooms him in
the family business. A police superintendent of Kashmiri stock finds
a beautiful Kashmiri bride from Punjab for Akbar Ali. Level-headed
Rahmatullah and his god-fearing friends try hard to ensure that
Telinipara remains an abode of peace. But rough times arrive,
Rahmatullah and his family go through a series of nightmarish
experiences. The mill is sold to a Marwari. Akbar Ali's Scot friends
return home and their concubines go their separate ways; one of them
is given shelter by Rahmatullah's wife. Communal passion rises to a
crescendo, close friends, belonging to both communities, get
murdered; Muslim blood is spilled to save Hindu lives, and Hindu
blood spilled to save Muslim lives. At a point of time, the family is
forced to flee to East Pakistan. But Rahmat and his son do not give
up their faith in India. As madness recedes, they return to
Telinipara. Akbar Ali's son, Mubasher, enjoys kindergarten life in
convent school and is admitted to Calcutta Boys' School, where he
learns to play pranks and develops a love for English literature. His
occasional visits to Pakistan, where he meets relatives on the
mother's side, cause a further broadening of experience. He proceeds
to Calcutta's Presidency College, and from there to celebrity status
as journalist and author. M.J. Akbar is Sheikh Rahmatullah's grandson.
Akbar's prose is crisp and sparkling. He has, besides, the knack of
injecting dynamics into the narrative at appropriate moments so that
the tension does not sag. A moral flows from the story, belonging to
the we-shall-overcome genre: living and toiling under the humble sky
of Telinipara, a pious converted Muslim preserves and prospers in
life, he grows influential in the neighbourhood. Malevolent
characters attempt to tear asunder the texture of daily routine of
the simple, god-fearing residents of the area. Akbar describes some
of these cruel, scheming people bent on mischief. But they cannot
kill the soul of Telinipara; the dream of an integrated India bathed
in communal harmony survives the arson and killings.
Considered as a fictional paradigm of economic development, social
mobility and Hindu-Muslim relations, Blood Brothers cannot but induce
empathy. Akbar crafts his tale with impressive skill and throws in
references to passages from both the Quran and Hindu puranas to
explain the psyche of particular characters - or perhaps to slyly
make fun of them.
There is a problem, however. Akbar would perhaps like to claim Blood
Brothers to be an authentic biography of three generations of his
family ending with himself. To sustain that claim, the narrative
should not have strayed from facts. It has. For example, the person
Akbar regards as the principal malefactor of his family was not ever
elected to the state assembly on a Congress ticket; his affiliation
was always with another party. The sub-story of how Atulya Ghosh
wangled a ticket for him is, it follows, pure fiction. If liberty is
taken with facts in one instance, might it not have been taken, the
query is inevitable, in some other instances too? Blood Brothers
therefore does not quite qualify as contemporary history; it is at
most a romanticized version of it.
The caveat notwithstanding, this family saga is outstandingly
marvellous stuff. It also helps to explain much about the genealogy
of the man M.J. Akbar is: brilliant and naughty, a hint of steel
inside, yet generous to a fault.
ASHOK MITRA
o o o
(iii)
INSAF Bulletin 50 - June 2006
International South Asia Forum (254 Kensington Ave, Westmount., QC,
Canada H3Z 2G6 (Tel. 514-9374714; e-mail; insaf at insaf.net
http://www.insaf.net
Editors, Daya Varma (Montreal) and Vinod Mubayi (New York).
circulation/website: Ramya Chellappa (New York).
1. The fury of the Haves and the Intellectualism of the Liberals
against Reservation -Daya Varma
2. Exit of Nepal king is a half victory; disbanding of the Royal Nepal
Army is urgently needed to preserve democracy -Daya Varma
3. Key changes in Nepal
4. The making of a democracy - Siddharth Varadarajan
5. The king is down but not out- Baburam Bhattarai interviewed by
Siddharth Varadarajan
6. Press release: the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) May 13, 2006
7.India divided 1947: who did it? why? how? and what now?' Ed. by
K.C.Yadav , Reviewed by Y. Sikand
8. Muslims in Bahraich, UP's most marginalised district by Azim A. Khan
Sherwani and Yoginder Sikand
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
Buzz on the perils of fundamentalist politics, on
matters of peace and democratisation in South
Asia. SACW is an independent & non-profit
citizens wire service run since 1998 by South
Asia Citizens Web: www.sacw.net/
SACW archive is available at: bridget.jatol.com/pipermail/sacw_insaf.net/
DISCLAIMER: Opinions expressed in materials carried in the posts do not
necessarily reflect the views of SACW compilers.
More information about the Sacw
mailing list