SACW | 13 May 2004
Harsh Kapoor
aiindex at mnet.fr
Wed May 12 21:18:13 CDT 2004
South Asia Citizens Wire | 13 May, 2004
via: www.sacw.net
[1] Pakistan: Gov't, Tribesmen Back to Square One (M B Naqvi)
[2] [Kashmir, India and Pakistan] Not a healthy concoction (Kuldip Nayar)
[3] India: [Nuclear Tests] Of Pokharan and polls (J Sri Raman)
[4] India: web site of the Election Commission of India
[5] India: Full text of the Supreme Court Best
Bakery judgement (Zahira Sheikh & Anr.Vs State of
Gujarat) dated May 07 2004 is online
[6] India: Press Note by Narmada Bachao Andolan, May 12, 2004
[7] India: Tales of Police Violence: villagers,
Veerappan and the STF (Bhaswati Chakravorty)
[8] Book Review: Nepal's Conflict Economy: Costs, Consequences and Alternatives
Bishwamber Pyakuryal (Shyamal Krishna Shrestha)
--------------
[1]
Inter Press Service
May 11, 2004
Pakistan: Gov't, Tribesmen Back to Square One
By M B Naqvi
ISLAMABAD, May 11 (IPS) - The Pakistani
government and the country's hardy tribesmen, the
two sides in the saga of military operations
against Taliban members suspected to be in
Pakistan, are again back to square one.
This is after the expiration of the May 7
extended deadline given to the rebellious
tribesmen in Southern Waziristan who are said to
be sheltering them.
The expected registration of all foreign Islamic
fanatics under the tribe's protection was a
condition to get the Pakistan government's
amnesty and obtain permission to go on living in
their tribal hideouts in this South Asian country.
The only other condition was their promise - to
be guaranteed by tribal leaders -- of not using
Pakistani soil to attack another country (read
Afghanistan).
That was a long time ago: Apr. 25, when the
modalities of availing of Pakistan's offer of
clemency were agreed between the two sides after
military operations to go after Taliban fighters
began in March.
This offer of clemency was undertaken through
local members of parliament, with the alliance of
six religious parties -- Muttaheda Majlis-i-Amal
(MMA) -- that controls over a third of Pakistan's
Parliament.
A deadline was fixed for when the non-Pakistanis
hiding in the tribal areas were to register. That
date was Apr. 30 -- but the date duly came and
went.
The outstanding leader of the 'other side', an
Afghan warlord still professing loyalty to the
Taliban supremo Mullah Umar, Nek Mohammad, came
with the mediators, negotiated some more with the
Pakistan Army and got another deadline by which
time registration would take place.
That was May 7, which also came and passed. Yet
another deadline has been set: May 14.
The deadlock persists. The pro-Taliban foreign
fighters, some of whom are said to be al-Qaeda
operatives, dread giving their details,
especially their photographs. They are said to be
Uzbeks, Chechens, Uighurs from China's Xinjiang
region, and from other Central Asian or Middle
East countries.
They fear that Pakistan will hand over this
information to the U.S. government, which will
then share this information with the authorities
of their mother countries.
It is a grave situation. These fugitives do have
a point. But this is not likely to wash with the
U.S. government or their proconsuls in
Afghanistan. Islamabad, needless to say, is under
intense pressure from those who now control
Afghanistan.
Kabul authorities, from President Hamid Karzai
and U.S. Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzade to the
local U.S. army commander, insist that Pakistan
should take larger-scale military action against
all those who use Pakistan's tribal areas as a
base to attack targets in Afghanistan.
There are thinly veiled threats that if Islamabad
fails to act decisively, the U.S. army will have
to come in and do that. Words from the top in
Washington imply the hope that Pakistan "will do
more".
On Pakistan's side, things are fearfully complex.
The scarcely hidden authoritarian regime of
President Gen Pervez Musharraf and his civilian
subordinates are committed to the U.S. cause
since Sep. 11.
He is also committed to build 'real' democracy
home. He credibly preaches a modernist and
moderate Islam at home and abroad, and that is
sweet music to the U.S. government. He is on the
hit list of al-Qaeda, having survived three
failed attempts on his life.
But, all said and done, it is an army-created
government and its real sanction is the army
underpinning it through its undercover agents.
For 30 years this army, supreme in politics, has
been sponsoring and favouring hardline
Islamicists. Its motto is '(Islamic) Faith, Piety
and Jihad (in God's way)'. Earlier, thanks to the
1980s Afghan war, this emphasis on hardline Islam
ran the risk of infecting its officers and men,
who had until 1970s been trained on the British
Army model.
Now, no one knows how many of its officers and
personnel actually sympathise with Islamic
zealots: Taliban, al-Qaeda and other nondescript
fanatics.
That is factor X of Pakistan politics, though
everyone goes on emphasising that this army is a
fine and highly disciplined force.
For 30 years the politics it has favoured, before
Sep. 11, was that of the religious parties',
especially Jamaat-i-Islami's. The successive
regimes, all underpinned by the army since 1977,
have pursued a policy in Kashmir that it called
'jihad'.
Religious parties, especially Jamaat-I-Islami,
have been of great help to the army in sustaining
the over 10-year long insurgency in
Indian-controlled Kashmir. A close relationship
has subsisted between the army and religious
parties, which were a team.
Some think they still are - even when, since
January this year, there is so much ballyhoo
about Pakistan-India friendship, which was
largely grandstanding to please the U.S.
government. Pakistan is actually known as the
most anti-U.S. country. Some of it is largely a
reaction to the vicissitudes of its 50-year-old
friendship with the U.S. government.
It used to be the most Allied Ally of America,
though Henry Kissinger himself is known to have
diagnosed its troubles as 'Pactitis' (with the
U.S.) government. Ordinary Pakistanis were
largely influenced by the marginalised left that
worked insidiously, making U.S. nationals the
most hated foreigners.
The latest 'war on terror' and Iraq have only
made the U.S. government more unpopular.
Meantime, the Pakistan military's campaign
against the Taliban can only be regarded as a
failure. Why? First, because the government
suffered too many casualties -- 60 dead --
against rebels' 40. It felt it had to stop the
operation. Otherwise, there was the risk of
fuelling a general uprising of all tribes that
would be all but impossible to quell.
Second, the rebels could not be forced to do what
the U.S. government wanted. Indeed, the
government got only the verbal promise from the
tribesmen that the Taliban, al-Qaeda and others
would not attack inside Afghanistan by using
Pakistani territory.
Today, two deadlines later, those recalcitrants
still have not implemented any condition under
which Islamabad had granted them amnesty.
(END/2004)
_____
[2]
Deccan Herald
May 12, 2004
NOT A HEALTHY CONCOCTION
BY Kuldip Nayar
IF Pakistan voted in our election, Prime Minister
Atal Behari Vajpayee would have swept the polls.
He is extremely popular in that country. I recall
the Pakistanis present at Lahore did not want
Nawaz Sharif, then the Prime Minister, to speak
because they thought it would be an anti-climax.
Sharif merely proposed a vote of thanks.
The Pakistanis have convinced themselves that
Vajpayee alone can normalise relations with
India. Their argument rests on two counts: first,
he is the one who has persistently tried to bury
the hatchet with Pakistan and, two, he heads the
BJP which will never accept a solution from any
other quarter in India.
There is a lot of truth in both the points. Not
that any political party is opposed to good
equation with Pakistan but the fact remains that
the BJP's concurrence is necessary since it has
come to represent what is known as the Hindu
viewpoint. It may sound like resurrecting the
two-nation theory. But the BJP's stamp is
necessary.
However, Pakistan is mistaken if it believes that
the two-nation theory can be extended to Jammu
and Kashmir. India, even if the BJP is willing to
trifurcate the state, will never agree to the
state's division on the basis of religion. Such a
solution can deliver a fatal blow to its
pluralistic society.
This is what I said at Brussels where a discourse
on Kashmir was held under the aegis of European
Parliament. Sardar Abdul Qayyam Khan from the
'Azad' Kashmir and Gohar Ayub Khan, former
Pakistan foreign minister, were present. They
raised no objection when I said that India would
never accept any solution of Kashmir which was
founded on religion. "We can't go back to
partition when one million people were killed and
20 million uprooted from their homes," I said.
I could not understand why the representatives of
European Parliament were insistent on associating
themselves with the talks between India and
Pakistan. They wanted a resolution to be adopted
for that purpose. Europe is part of the West
which has lost its credibility after what has
happened to Iraq at the hands of America.
What swung the opinion at the Brussels Discourse
against European Parliament's intervention was
the intense hatred that the fate of Iraq had
evoked in the Islamic world. The Kashmir
expatriates and the Pakistanis present at the
discourse were conscious of what would happen to
Kashmir if Europe were to be involved. It was
satisfying to see that the offer of "good
offices" by European Parliament was rejected.
But that does not, solve the Kashmir problem. We,
in India, may honestly believe that Kashmir is
the symptom and not the disease and that the
disease is the mistrust between India and
Pakistan. Still that mistrust will need to be
removed. Isn't the lack of solution on Kashmir
sustaining that mistrust?
It is possible that while tackling Kashmir we may
stumble upon some ways to have confidence in each
other. Beating the same old path or debating the
discussed and re-discussed solutions may not do.
This is not the job that can be left to the
foreign offices or the bureaucracies in the two
countries. They carry too much baggage of the
past. The Pakistan Foreign Office repeated the
other day "the right of self-determination." But
President General Pervez Musharraf has
realistically stated that the demand for
implementing the UN resolutions on Kashmir was
outmoded.
Some "innovative" solutions, as Vajpayee had
suggested, should be found. This would require a
non-official effort like the one on the lines of
people-to-people contact. Such individuals from
India and Pakistan who have no political,
religious or other agenda of their own or of
their governments, should meet and re-meet to
discuss Kashmir. They may be able to draw the
contours of a proposal which has the consensus
behind it. Leaders from Kashmir should be
associated at some stage so that what is worked
out is acceptable to all the three. No time limit
can be fixed. The beginning of the process is
important, not the deadline.
The Indians, however, must accept the blame for
messing up Kashmir. We have held no fair
elections, except the one in 1977. The Election
Commission has asserted itself in the last two
polls, as it is doing now. The polls have been
fairly honest despite violence and the pressure
of boycott. The story has not been any different
this time. Still, 40 per cent of voters in the
state exercised their franchise. This is not a
bad scenario.
But New Delhi should realise that Kashmir is a
political problem, not something that the
security forces can sort out. Many army chiefs
have gone on record as saying that Kashmir cannot
be solved militarily. What we have to do is to
devise ways to stop human rights violations. The
security forces, although curbed, continue to
indulge in excesses. Despite strict instructions
to the armed forces, instances of brutality have
been quite a few. Interrogation centres have
lessened in number but they are still there. It
is a pity that the gun culture has got ingrained
in the psyche of the Kashmiris and those who are
helping or fighting them. Too much time has been
wasted and too many people have been alienated.
Why didn't the government hold talks with the
Hurriyat leaders in the 1990s when human rights
activists repeatedly told it to do so? I wonder
if posterity would ever forgive the successive
governments at Delhi for all the harm they have
done to Kashmir. Terrorists have, no doubt,
disfigured what was once an honest movement for
autonomy. But New Delhi's hands have not been
clean. It is time for retrospection.
On the other hand, Islamabad has not allowed the
state to settle down from day one. It has been
driven partly by its own ambition and partly by
its policy to keep the problem alive for home
consumption. Pakistan has looked at Kashmir from
the religious point of view, not from the
Kashmiris' point view. In the process, it has
lost the pull it once had.
The lesson both India and Pakistan have to learn
- if the rulers can ever learn - is to keep
religion separate from the state. New Delhi has
been making efforts off and on without much
success. Islamabad has had no compunction in
mixing religion with the state, although it has
realised belatedly, the dangers of the nexus.
Take the attempt to reform education in Pakistan.
The Sustainable Development Policy Institute, an
independent body, has said in a report that books
used in schools contribute to the growth of bias
based on religious belief and encourage
"discrimination against minorities." The
government has shelved the report because it
could not even put the Quranic verse from one
section to another of the "sacred curriculum.''
As far as India is concerned, education minister
Murli Manohar Joshi is in the midst of changing
books and re-writing history. If the BJP-led
coalition returns to power, he will be like a
bull in the China shop. Religion will be
introduced with a vengeance in the name of
culture or tradition.
After elections, I hope, India will go back to
its ethos of secularism and Pakistan to its
founder's exhortation of not mixing religion with
the state. Unless the two countries rise above
parochialism, they have little future.
_____
[3]
The Daily Times [Pakistan]
May 13, 2004
OF POKHARAN AND POLLS
by J Sri Raman
Long before the official declaration of the
election results, the claim has been belied by
exit polls, which have provided more accurate
pointers than the pre-election opinion polls
As I write this on May 11, there is no sign of
India remembering the sixth anniversary of the
Pokharan II nuclear-weapon tests. The entire
country seems to be engrossed in the daylong
declaration of State Assembly election results
from Andhra Pradesh (AP), as a prelude to the
outcome of the polls to India's Parliament. As
this column appears in print, the new Lok Sabha
(the Lower House of India's Parliament) will have
begun to take shape.
On May 11, 1998, India ended what has since been
described as an era of 'nuclear ambiguity'. Six
eventful years later, it can be said to be
entering a period of political ambiguity that can
end in an equally explosive manner.
The tests came within two months of a minority
coalition government, under Atal Behari Vajpayee,
taking over in New Delhi. It was with much
fanfare that the leaders of the Bharatiya Janata
Party (BJP) announced that they had implemented
one of the first and fundamental tasks on the
pristine agenda of the party. In less than a year
from then, the BJP came back to more stable power
at the head of a stronger coalition under a more
sainted Vajpayee.
Until the other day, the gospel, according to the
mainstream media, was that the BJP, with its
parliamentary-political camp of the National
Democratic Alliance (NDA) and its
extra-parliamentary extension of the 'parivar'
('the family'), has been going from strength to
strength and its leader growing into loftier and
loftier sainthood. When the Prime Minister
decided to dissolve the Lok Sabha months ahead of
the due time and go for a mid-term general
election, the media chorus was that the decision
was only the latest in a long series of political
masterstrokes. Pundits saw the election leading
to an enlarged majority for the NDA and even the
promise of single-party power for the BJP over
the coming period.
Long before the official declaration of the
election results, the claim has been belied by
exit polls, which have provided more accurate
pointers than the pre-election opinion polls. The
pollsters might prove wrong about the precise
figures, but it is already clear that the BJP has
reason to rue its decision. The reason is
reinforced by the results from AP that spell a
decisive rout for the party's most important
regional ally so far.
It is the Telugu Desam Party (TDP) of AP chief
minister Chandrababu Naidu, with its strong
parliamentary presence, that has helped Vajpayee
and the NDA survive in power whenever they needed
such support in the games of numbers the
politicians play. Naidu was quick to follow in
Vajpayee's footsteps by opting to dissolve the
State Assembly (where he enjoyed more than a
comfortable majority) a full year ahead of
schedule, and face simultaneous elections to the
Assembly and the Lok Sabha. The BJP-TDP electoral
alliance was a logical sequel, all the more so
for the similarity of the 'developmental' planks
adopted by the two parties.
The BJP kicked off its election campaign with the
'India Shining' commercial and a ''feel-good'
claim, as discussed before in these columns. The
theme of a new economic and developmental élan
that India was supposed to have acquired over the
past few years was harped upon. Naidu, for his
part, has continued to be hailed as the 'CEO of
AP Inc'.
The Assembly election results show that the AP
voter is not convinced that Naidu deserves such a
title for the policies and performance
responsible for, among other things, the mass
peasant suicides in the State. And, if the exit
polls are any evidence, the common Lok Sabha
voter in many parts of the country has not
exactly lapped up the 'India Shining' hype,
either.
The BJP and the TDP, searching for a renewed
political mandate, have thus ended up with
popular verdicts against their economic policies
and performance. The results, however, are
unlikely to produce either a clear or stable
political alternative. This is not only because
of the numbers, though these may produce several
party permutations and combinations at the cost
of professed principles in the coming period, but
even more so because of the nature of the
campaign with which the Congress-led opposition
has countered the BJP-headed alliance.
The attempt of the Congress would indeed appear
to have been to avoid frontal opposition to the
fascist and militarist fundamentals of the
ideology and outlook that the BJP represents and
Vajpayee has made respectable. Many analysts have
commented on the manner in which the Congress has
sought to play down its opposition to
majoritarian communalism. Very few, however, have
pointed to the party's conspicuous concern not to
appear as an opponent of the perilous process of
nuclear weaponisation initiated by the BJP rulers.
Anxious to associate itself with the process and
even claim credit for paving the way for it with
the 'peaceful' nuclear programmes of the past
Congress governments, the main opposition party
has pointedly omitted to tell the people that
nuclear militarism is incompatible with either
the avowed moves for South Asian peace or
amelioration of the lot of the poor. Which is
what makes the prospect of the post-election
political uncertainty as dangerous as India's
past policy of nuclear ambiguity.
The writer is a journalist and peace activist based in Chennai, India
_____
[4]
The final results of India's 2004 National
elections will be known later today [May 13]. The
counting of votes begins at 8 AM (Indian Standard
Time); Results are to be progressively available
online at the web site of the Election Commission
of India. (see URL below)
www.eci.gov.in
______
[5]
Full text of the Supreme Court Best Bakery
judgement (Zahira Sheikh & Anr.Vs State of
Gujarat) dated May 07 2004 is now available
online at the URL below
www.sabrang.com/news/2004/2ndjudgement.pdf
______
[6]
Press Note/ May 12, 2004
FOURTH DAY OF NARMADA LAND-RIGHT SATYAGRAHA: TRIBALS PREPARE FOR NEW LIFE
"We Will Plant Tree on Degraded Forest Land. Forest is Better Protected by
Tribals"
Hundreds of displaced tribals in the Narmada valley continued the Bhoomi
Hakk Satyagraha (Land-right Satyagraha) on fourth day on Monday (May 11).
They are demanding the immediate implementation of the decisions by the
Maharashtra government for the resettlement with land before the monsoon
and subsequent submergence threatening their lives due to the raising of
the height of the Sardar Sarovar dam up to 110 meters. They made it clear
that, the Government must come forward with some piece of land where the
more than 1500 families could be resettled before the onset of monsoon, in
a fixed time frame. If this was not done, they declared that, " There will
be no option left for us but to occupy this piece of degraded forest land,
as our villages are bound to be submerged once the dam work reaches 110
meters."
On Tuesday (May 12), the forest department slammed a notice on Narmada
Bachao Andolan (NBA), against entering in the forest land. Medha Patkar in
turn alleged that the forest department had been violating the law and had
allowed over 6800 hectates of forest to be drowned in the dam.
The Satyagraha by over 200 families from the first villages from
Maharashtra, threatened with the Sardar Sarovar dam and its imminent
submergence due to the raising of dam height up to 110 m. during this
monsoon, along with the activists and supporters of Narmada Bachao Andolan
was launched on May 8, near the forest land between Somaval-Alivihir
(Dist. Nandurbar). Despite heavy downpour for two consecutive nights and
the tension created by vested political interests, the Satyagrahis
continued with their non-violent agitation and they have also started
preparing for constuctive work (nav-nirman).
The Maharashtra villagers were compelled to undertake this step as the
state government and administration again and again failed to provide
land-based resettlement, despite repeated assurances, committees and
written declarations preceded by number of dharnas (sit-in), fasts, and
negotiations. And the heavy downpour on 7,8 and 9th May confirmed the fear
- if at all needed - about the tragedy that awaits them during the
monsoon. That is why, they are now resolute to get the land-based
rehabilitation before the monsoon. That is why they have made clear that
they would be compelled to start farming on the degraded forest land, if
the government did not come with suitable chunk of land - which was
assured n-th time.
To allay fear of some of the environmentalists, the NBA made it clear
that, "there is hardly a tree on this piece of land, which officially
belongs to the Forest Department. " The trees have been chopped down long
ago. The NBA has always maintained that instead of felling trees, we will
plant and rejuvenate new forest, and that is why for this camp we have
brought kerosene and bamboo so that we do not disturb the local ecology.
The forest is best preserved, not by the Forest Department, but by the
Adivasis", it asserted.
The Maharashtra police and administration paraded the some tribals from
adjoining areas to oppose the Narmada tribals. These tribals, instigated
by the local politician of the Bharatiya Janata Party and encouraged by
the police and administration to portray the Satyagraha merely as tribal
versus tribal feud. The NBA has made it clear that the Narmada tribals do
not wish to fight with their tribal brethren and together they should
fight with the government for the land rights and titles. The state
government, if it wishes, should other suitable and large chunk of land,
for a community based resettlement of all affected villagers according to
the provisions of the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal (NWDT).
Nav-Nirman
The displaced tribals are determined to get the land ñbased resettlement
at least at this juncture and establish the Narmada Jeevan Gaon (Narmada
Village for Life). Veteran social worker and former bureaucrat R.V.
Bhuskute started his training in land mapping, surveying and demarcation.
The team of the Masum, a peopleís health organization, held the camp for
womenís health and other ailments. Activities are going on regarding the
education and house-construction. The Andolan has been trying to develop
all these constructive activities on the lines of alternative view of
development. Number of supporters from other parts of Maharashtra and
India are joining them to help them to re-start the life. A team of
activists from anti-Coca-Cola struggle in Plachimada (Kerala) and comrades
from Delhi, Madhya Praedsh, Delhi and other parts of Maharashtra are with
them. The villagers of Somaval resettlement site, the earlier re-settlers
from the Narmada valley, have been providing all solidarity
and support for their brethren from their own villages and are part of
their struggle for gaining their rights.
Background
Over 1,500 from Maharashtra and 10,000 families from Madhya Pradesh are
in the submergence zone of 110 m. Despite the repeated attempts by the
Andolan like like dharna and indefinite fast in Nashik in May 2003 or in
January 2004 at Mumbai, and inspite of recommendations by state government
appointed committees like Justice Daud committee, Task Force Committee,
there is practically no progress on resettlement count. Maharashtra
government has avoided implementation of the Cabinetís own decisions taken
on January 21 and 28, whereby the state was to update its records
including the left out families and not to allow the dam height to go
beyond 100m unless rehabilitation work was completed. When adequate land
is not yet identified, records not updated, and roads not built, there is
no way the governments could save the affected familiesí houses, villages,
from drowning and devastation in this very monsoon.
Narmada valley people are determined to assert and gain their rights and
to usher in the new life, alternative development. The people in the
Narmada valley call unto all the people and organizations, who have faith
in humanity, equality and democracy, to support them from various parts
and join the new endeavour of Jeevan Gaon in the various facets of life.
Prominent Support
Meanwhile, prominent citizens including former high court judges Rajinder
Sachar, S.M. Daud, litterateur U.R. Ananthmurthy,K.N. Panikkar, M.P.
Parameswaran (Kerala Sastra Sahitya Parishad), political scientist
Yogesndra Yadav, former navy chief Admiral Ram Das, renowned secular
activist and scholar Asgar Ali Engineer, film maker Anand Patwardhan,
veteran political ideologue Surendra Mohan and others expressed full
support to the Land Right Satyagraha. In a statement they urged the
Maharashtra government not to see this as a law and order problem, but
deal with care and sensitivity to ensure the livelihood of Adivasis. " We
appeal to the governments to legally transfer this land to the Adivasis
who have made a claim to the land and extend government services to create
a model rehabilitation site by involving Narmada Bachao Andolan and other
civil society groups" they said. They also urged the governments not to
permit any further construction of the dam, without completing first the
rehabilitation of all affected adivasis satisfactorily.
Suniti S.R.
Shyam Patil
Sanjay Sangvai
NARMADA BACHAO ANDOLAN
B-13, Shivam Flats, Ellora Park, Baroda-390007 (Ph. 0265-2282232
baroda at narmada.org) 58, Gandhi Marg, Badwani, M.P.(Ph. 07290-222464
badwani at narmada.org)
______
[7]
The Telegraph [India]
May 13, 2004
SHOCK ON THE BODY
- The Sadashiva commission report on police violence should be published
Bhaswati Chakravorty
Making inquiries
"The parents being given electric shocks,/ The
children cry 'amma' 'apa', /So they are given
electric shocks,/ They can't cry 'amma' 'apa'./
Tana-nee-na nee-na ta-na/ Nee-na tana tana
nee-na," sings the composer of this Tamil song, a
startlingly thin 24-year-old, the only male
survivor of a family in Oornatham village in
Lakkampatty panchayat, some miles away from
Mettur town in Tamil Nadu. The catchy folk-ballad
describes the events that usually follow when
Special Task Force [STF] men, engaged by the
governments of Tamil Nadu and Karnataka to catch
Veerappan, descend on any of the villages close
to the hilly forests that are his domain, to
arrest "informers" or "helpers" of the now
legendary criminal.
In the universe of inhumanities, the condition of
the prisoners in Abu Ghraib is slightly different
from the villagers picked up by the STF in the
name of Veerappan. Many of them "died" in
custody, others were released after a few days or
months and still others were incarcerated under
the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities
(Prevention) Act for years without trial. There
has been no digital camera to tell their story to
the world.
Murugeshan, the singer, was picked up as a
youngster and released after a few days. He
watched his father and uncle being beaten, being
subjected to electric shocks, hung upside down
and beaten on the soles, and being rolled flat by
an iron roller. He had to watch, there was no
escape from that if your closest kin were being
"interrogated". The two men were then shot, he
did not see that. Murugeshan is reticent; the
details come from his parents' friend, who had
been with them. Rama Naicker can only limp along
on his stick, his hands and feet useless, his
eyes blinded by sunlight, his voice barely
audible. Murugeshan's mother was released too,
after going through the same routine. She is now
"mental", like many of her fellow survivors. She
stood by as one woman narrated how, when the STF
came, this woman's husband said, "I cannot bear
torture," and killed himself. Murugeshan's
mother's eyes look and don't look, they don't
really connect, and it seems a further violation
to expect her to speak.
The STF picked up the biggest haul of villagers
in 1993, after Veerappan blew up 22 people,
including policemen and forest officials. Since
he cannot be caught - even though the Tamil Nadu
government claimed that the task force had
reduced his followers to three or four and
policemen said they had been in "viewing
distance" of him many times - the STF must show
something for the more than Rs 100 crore that the
two states have spent for his capture. The
villagers need not always be picked up. They can
be sent into the forest, allegedly to lead STF
men to Veerappan, and then shot in the back in an
"encounter". Or they can be just beaten up, if
they are buying more than two days' provisions at
a time, because the extra must be for Veerappan.
Mani's little brother was sleeping when the STF
burst into the house. They beat him up. He is
over 20 now, shuffles quietly along with his
hands held stiffly in front and looks as though
he might flee. He has grown up running
frienziedly at the sight of a jeep or a uniform,
or at the sound of a horn.
The usual pick-ups are the tribal people, who
collect forest produce, and Veerappan's kin and
castemen. The Vanniyars are therefore most
vulnerable, and among them, those of the
sub-caste Arasupadachi, to which Veerappan
belongs. Between 1993-94, many were released from
custody, most maimed for life and many of the
women without their men. Mathy's husband had been
taken. Those released seven months later told her
that he had been set on fire. Since he refused to
die, the STF had to poison him, they said.
Sivagammy, of Naickerthanda village, heard after
seven months of hopeful waiting that her husband
had been shot nine days after being taken, that
is, exactly nineteen days after their wedding.
But the stories stayed with the tellers for
years, the terror was too great. It was not
before 1995-97 that the tellers surfaced, helped
by social work organizations that counselled them
and gave them the courage to speak. In June,
1999, the National Human Rights Commission, in
response to allegations of torture and harassment
by STF personnel, constituted a panel headed by
A.J. Sadashiva, a former judge of the Karnataka
high court, to look into the complaints. The
Sadashiva commission has submitted its report
sometime back. It is mystifying that in a land
where the press is free, the commission is so
little heard of, and that its report remains
unrevealed to the public.
There have been fewer arrests in recent times,
although a fortyish man described his month-long
custody as late as in 2000. They all talk about
the electric shocks, pointing first of all to the
earlobes and then to other parts of the body -
the inside of the mouth, for example. This man,
like other men, was blindfolded with his hands
tied behind his back before the electric charge
was released. He lost all sense of time. Most of
the released men cannot work at all: it is not
just pain, it is that their systems do not
function any more.
But the STF are very much around. A stranger can
go in only for social work. In every village, the
quietness of the glowing sky, green fields and
rows of coconut palms on the forested slopes is
shattered within minutes by the sputtering of the
inevitable motorbike, as STF men cruise past to
find out who has come. The news reaches them in a
flash, through informants among the villagers.
In one village, two of them came up to inquire.
The questioner looked like a well-built young
god, and he stood astride the threshold of
another man's house as if the place were his to
kick aside. It was not enough for him to be told
that the usual NGOs had come to check on the
progress of self-help groups, a common programme
in all the villages. Are you working only with
torture victims? he asked. With everyone who is
poor, was the answer. The self-help groups, which
have become an important activity for the women,
are deliberately composed of victims and
non-victims, as one of the ways in which to
reduce the victims' sense of isolation.
The men and the older women talk about their
experiences in some detail. In Periyathanda
village, Thippy cannot begin her day without her
ten tablets, the pain is terrible. She cannot see
in the sun, cannot wet her hair or feet because
that is agony, her "internal machinery", like
that of many others, has been shattered. Her
husband has left her. Social workers took her to
a specialist hospital which has prescribed
another dose of controlled shocks. Thippy, who
earlier tried to commit suicide, is now willing
to go for the neurological treatment.
It is the returning spirit of the victims that
makes them broadcast their experiences as the STF
keeps touring the village. Thangamma insists on
repeating at every public forum how many times a
senior police officer had raped her during her
three-and-a-half years in jail. No bribe will
shut her up.
But the younger women are less open. Multiple
rape, much of it in front of husbands, brothers
and in-laws, and electric shocks in the vagina,
do not encourage conversation. The adults in a
large number of the 600 affected families are
solely women, who can work only if they rest
every other day.
In Mettupalaiyur village in Karungullur
panchayat, old Chinapallai, her hands twisted out
of shape by electric shocks and beatings, and her
scarred legs barely managing to carry her, has
lost her husband, four children, among them two
sons, and a son-in-law. They have nothing, they
say, they live because they have to. Her
daughter, her body and mouth held together like a
silent shrug, works in a field. Nor does Lakshmi
feel like talking, as she settles her gaunt,
thirty-plus body among the others gathered before
her house in Chettipatty village in Kaveripuram
panchayat. She and her husband were TADA
detainees for nine years: when she came out, her
husband and brother-in-law were dead. Perumai and
her daughter were arrested under TADA. Perumai's
husband, her five sons-in-law and one grandson
are all dead. Their smiles are polite and
humourless, their eyes brilliant and blank.
Muthulaxmi, whose husband has left her because
she was raped so many times, turns away angrily
to wipe the tears that will come in spite of
herself.
"Even our memories don't work right after the
electric shocks, there are spells of blankness,"
says Lakshmi. There are spells of blankness for
an observer too. At certain moments the senses
try to shut down completely, to stop registering
faces and eyes, the stiffly held bodies, the
hands. The mind wants to cower and hide.
In spite of the STF's repeated efforts to stall
gatherings, the NGOs managed to hold a large
meeting in Martapalli on the border on March 18
to argue against the death penalty of the four
remaining TADA prisoners. The court has postponed
the execution. Medical camps have been foiled by
STF efforts at the last minute, although one held
sometime ago shocked the doctors who came. But
even now, local doctors refuse to give victims
written prescriptions. Torture should not be
recognized by law-abiding citizens of the state,
which is trying so hard to protect them from one
dangerous criminal.
But some of the victims' children are now being
given aid to study. Many want to be lawyers: they
want to fight human rights violations. The NGOs
have trained a few victims as volunteers in the
campaign, Murugeshan and Mani are volunteers. So
is Murugan, lanky and fragile with childlike
eyes, radiating a determination that makes
Murugeshan say of the STF, "They are afraid of us
now."
Murugan was arrested with his family when he was
12. He and his father were in prison for eight
years, where they drove nails into his feet.
Reportedly the second youngest child in India to
have been incarcerated, he shows where his feet
still hurt to walk. His younger brother was
released from custody, but not until electric
shocks had been tried on the little boy to see
what he could say about Veerappan.
It means a lot to them that they can now face the
STF, that they can speak out to the world. They
need legal, medical and psychological help, and
livelihood options, all of which the NGOs are
trying to address. But most of all, they are
demanding that elusive and intractable thing
called justice; monetary aid is not an answer.
They have all deposed before the Sadashiva
commission, whatever it cost them, for one reason
alone: what has happened to them should never
happen to anyone else. If this means anything to
the rest of the country, it is time to demand
that the report of the commission be made public.
______
[8]
Nepali Times [Nepal]
7-13 May 2004
Development amidst war
"Wars are devastating wherever they occur." -
UNDP Human Development Report, 1997
For Nepal, mired in poverty and ravaged by
conflict, the ramifications of the nine-year
Maoist insurgency is severe for the economy and
development and leading Nepali economist,
Bishwambar Pyakuryal,explores the link between
conflict and the economy in his new book, Nepal's
Conflict Economy: Costs, Consequences and
Alternatives.
Pyakuryal's objective is to develop a methodology
for calculating the economic cost from the Maoist
insurgency, review the impact of the conflict on
the economy, establish links between
underdevelopment and conflict, and make policy
recommendations for public policy in the current
scenario. In its approach paper to the Tenth
Plan, the government has stated that Nepal's
negative growth rate of 0.6 percent during the
last fiscal year 2001/02 of the Ninth Plan could
be primarily attributed to escalation of the
conflict. Another non-government study has
estimated an average loss of 1.25 percent of GDP
since 1997. Trends like declining production,
falling exports, shift from tradable commodities
to non-tradable commodities and increased aid
dependency indicate economic stagnation.
Rural-to-urban migration is pressurising civic
infrastructure and leaving whole villages without
able-bodied labour. Both farms and firms are
operating below capacity levels and cost overruns
have become a normal feature of business. By
identifying Nepal's poor performance in meeting
human development goals as the primary cause of
the insurgency, Pyakuryal ignores other issues
like unequal production relations and the
perpetuation of a growth process that has been
neither rapid nor equitable until today.
Given the conflict has put a strain on scarce
resources, how can growth be fostered? Unless a
resolution to the conflict is found, the economy
will continue to reel under the 'shock'. In the
immediate future, Pyakuryal proposes that the
state forge partnerships with non-state actors
(both the 'revolutionaries' and the private
sector). It is unlikely that the Maoists will
suddenly have a change of heart.
Donors threaten to cut aid if the situation
worsens. An expansionist fiscal policy is
proposed so that investment, employment and,
ultimately, growth are stimulated. It is doubtful
that such a policy will suffice. State-owned
banks are faced with mounting debts and
non-performing assets, insurgents frequently rob
public banks and everyone is subject to extortion.
The contributors echo the need to intervene
meaningfully rather than be complacent with
macroeconomic stability. Once peace is restored,
the economy will rebound. Large-scale
reconstruction and development strategies to
address the roots of the conflict must be
tackled. Therein lies Nepal's future prosperity.
NEPAL'S CONFLICT ECONOMY: COSTS, CONSEQUENCES AND ALTERNATIVES
BISHWAMBER PYAKURYAL
Nepal Economic Association, Kathmandu. 2004.
Shyamal Krishna Shrestha is a Research Associate
at Institute for Integrated Development Studies
(IIDS), Kathmandu.
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
Buzz on the perils of fundamentalist politics, on
matters of peace and democratisation in South
Asia. SACW is an independent & non-profit
citizens wire service run since 1998 by South
Asia Citizens Web: www.sacw.net/
The complete SACW archive is available at:
bridget.jatol.com/pipermail/sacw_insaf.net/
South Asia Counter Information Project a sister
initiative, provides a partial back -up and
archive for SACW: snipurl.com/sacip
See also associated site: www.s-asians-against-nukes.org
DISCLAIMER: Opinions expressed in materials carried in the posts do not
necessarily reflect the views of SACW compilers.
--
More information about the Sacw
mailing list