SACW | 16 Oct. 2003

Harsh Kapoor aiindex at mnet.fr
Thu Oct 16 16:29:50 CDT 2003


SOUTH ASIA CITIZENS WIRE   |  16 October,  2003

Announcements:
a)  The SACW web site is down, users are invited 
to use Google cache till further notice.
b) 'South Asia Counter Information Project' a 
back-up, archive area and sister site of SACW can 
be accessed at: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/sacw/
c) All  SACW and associated list members in India 
wanting to consult web sites being blocked at 
groups.yahoo.com   may try to bypass the 'ban' 
via:
http://www.proxify.com
http://www.multiproxy.org/multiproxy.htm  [a more 
detailed list iss given below]

+++++

[1] [Rulers of Pakistan and India complete 4 
years in Power] Uninspiring four years (Praful 
Bidwai)
[2] Khakhi Short and Saffron Flags Making Mayhem in Ayodhya
- Ayodhya Diary : On the Back foot (Raghuvanshmani)
- Making trouble but going nowhere  (Editorial,  The Hindu)
- Admn has VHP reeling (Srawan Shukla & Vn Arora)
- VHP show begins with a whimper but early days yet
[3] Salaam Judiciary - Salaam India (M Hasan Jowher)
[4] Goa's Governor Makes a dangerous statement  re  Re-Construction of Temples
[5] Press Release : South India Coalition for Sexuality Rights
[6] New publication: "Sex Selection: Issues and concerns"
[7] India beckons as a test-bed for western drug companies: (Ray Marcelo)
[8] Resist internet censorship in India: a list 
of new proxy servers to bypass the ban on groups 
yahoo com

--------------

[1.]


The News International [Pakistan]
October 16, 2003

Uninspiring four years

Praful Bidwai

It is of course a pure coincidence that the 
fourth anniversaries of both General Pervez 
Musharraf's coup d'etat and Prime Minister Atal 
Behari Vajpayee's return to power in New Delhi 
after the Lok Sabha elections should be separated 
only by one day. But it is not a coincidence that 
the events should have passed relatively 
unnoticed and certainly uncelebrated in both 
countries. The record of neither government is 
particularly inspiring.

There is yet another connection between October 
12 and 13, 1999. Musharraf's coup against Nawaz 
Sharif cannot be separated from their differences 
over the Kargil conflict, itself attributable to 
the new belligerence in both India and Pakistan 
produced by their nuclearisation in May 1998. The 
Bharatriya Janata Party's return to power in 1999 
was in no small way related to that belligerent, 
militant, hypernationalism.

In India, only the BJP celebrated the fourth 
anniversary of Vajpayee's National Democratic 
Alliance government - mainly at its party 
headquarters. The people did not. The anniversary 
was eclipsed by the new offensive launched by the 
Vishwa Hindu Parishad around the Ayodhya temple, 
which highlights rifts, not cohesion, within the 
sangh parivar.

The government recently launched a blitz of 
expensive half- and full-page newspaper 
advertisements, talking smugly and 
self-congratulatingly of "India Shining", with 
the economy (or rather the stock markets) "on a 
roll", people "ringing in the good times" with 
cellular phones, and with new highways (or 
rather, toll-ways) being built under the "Golden 
Quadrilateral" programme. But nobody was much 
impressed.

India has indeed witnessed five to six percent 
GDP growth over the past four years. But that 
happened earlier under Congress and United Front 
governments too. The BJP cannot take credit for 
that. Faster GDP growth has produced fewer, not 
more, jobs. Growth has been extremely unbalanced, 
and sharpened regional and class disparities.

The past four years have witnessed a contraction 
and withdrawal of public services, especially 
healthcare and primary education, which are being 
rampantly privatised. In many ways, the sinews of 
the economy, especially its technological base 
and its core industrial and capital goods 
capacities, have been weakened under neoliberal 
policies, mindless globalisation and wholesale 
deregulation. Grotesque inequalities now threaten 
to disrupt and destabilise Indian society.

The NDA's political record is even worse. It has 
pursued and lent respectability to rank communal 
politics and a perverse ethnico-religious 
nationalism. It has robbed vast numbers of people 
of their citizenship rights and made the 
minorities feel insecure in this "nation of the 
minorities" - where there is no large unified or 
homogenous group within the same religious 
denomination.

The NDA has shamelessly abused official agencies 
to intimidate its opponents, as it is doing to 
former Uttar Pradesh chief minister Mayawati. The 
BJP practises outrageously confrontationist 
politics, undermining the integrity of democratic 
and liberal institutions, such as parliamentary 
committees, including the Public Accounts 
Committee, the Finance Commission, National Human 
Rights Commission, Election Commission, and 
sometimes, even the Supreme Court.

The BJP is trying to convert India into an 
authoritarian "National Security" state by 
exaggerating and communalising "security 
threats", and imposing draconian laws. It has 
militarised society and almost doubled India's 
military expenditure over five years - and yet 
made the public more insecure. It is trying to 
turn India into a vassal state of the United 
States, while mindlessly pursuing hostility 
towards Pakistan.

India's global profile, especially its economic 
profile, may have gone up somewhat, but most of 
its basic problems, including its crisis of 
governance, remain unresolved.

How does Pakistan's record over the four years 
look from the Indian point of view? Musharraf 
came to power condemning corrupt politicians for 
their abuse of power - a view that is probably 
shared by much of the public - and promising to 
"salvage the nation" from their machinations. He 
also cast himself in the role of the 
moderniser-reformer who would take on militant 
political Islam and clean up the political system.

Musharraf raised many hopes. Even progressive and 
liberal-spirited people in Pakistan's civil 
society, it seemed to us, were divided over what 
approach to adopt towards him, which is why 
someone with the whistle-clean image of Omar 
Asghar Khan joined his government.

In the event, most of the promises were betrayed: 
whether on punishing and deterring tax evaders, 
abolishing the more obnoxious of the Hudood laws, 
making the government more accountable, or 
combating extremist and militant Islam. By 
mid-2001, Pakistan again seemed to be drifting in 
the direction of endemic instability, sectarian 
strife, systemic incoherence, even state failure.

Had it not been for the catastrophic events of 
September 11, Pakistan's drift might have got 
accelerated and its marginalisation in the world 
greatly increased. But with the "war on 
terrorism", the US forged a new alliance with 
Pakistan, and rescued it economically and 
politically.

September 11 gave Musharraf a unique opportunity 
to return assertively to his reform agenda and 
take on Islamist extremists without getting into 
an excessively dependent relationship with 
Washington and while maintaining a dignified 
distance from its parochial interests. Two years 
on, that opportunity too seems to have been lost.

The sordid India-Pakistan sideshow to the "war on 
terror" limited both states' options as they 
tried to outsmart each other and competitively 
courted the US. Islamabad's anti-Taliban alliance 
with Washington was strong enough to antagonise 
and strengthen radical Islamists, especially in 
the provinces bordering Afghanistan, but it 
wasn't strong enough to instil confidence in the 
Musharraf regime that it could really confront 
the extremists, clean up the mess in the armed 
forces, and get rid of multiple, competing 
power-centres.

Musharraf ended up undermining and virtually 
crippling the country's only two political 
parties with some kind of social base and 
organisational continuity. Recently, sectarian 
violence has worsened. The parliamentary 
elections of last year have produced an uneasy 
diarchy. Barring a quasi-revival of the economy, 
and US military aid, there is little that the 
Musharraf-Jamali government can claim credit for, 
which will impress the public.

However, one of the greatest disappointments of 
the past four years is the failure of the 
Musharraf and Vajpayee governments to reform 
their old, bankrupt and indeed irresponsibly and 
dangerously hostile policies towards each other, 
to make a new beginning.

Both continue to behave as if there could be a 
military solution to their many mutual disputes - 
"aar paar ki ladai", as Vajpayee put it - despite 
their nuclear weapons-states status. They have 
both allowed and encouraged hardliners in their 
Establishments who believe that peaceful 
co-existence between India and Pakistan is now a 
virtual impossibility.

That's why six months after Vajpayee held out his 
"hand of friendship" to Pakistan from Srinagar, 
the "peace process" is all but dead. In India, it 
has already become a hostage to domestic politics 
centred on elections to five state assemblies, 
for which the campaign has begun. Worse, official 
exchanges have once again deteriorated to the 
level of abuse. And Vajpayee now says inviting 
Musharraf to Agra was a blunder!

As we reflect on the two anniversaries, one thing 
is certain. History will not forgive India's and 
Pakistan's rulers for having learnt nothing and 
forgotten nothing - and for having put
their states and their military machines on the 
path of a confrontation in which a nuclear 
holocaust is a distinct, and horrifying, 
possibility.

____


[2.]       [Khakhi Short and Saffron Flags Making Mayhem in Ayodhya  ]


October 16, 2003

Ayodhya Diary

On the Back foot

by Raghuvanshmani
Faizabad, UP[India]

The security measures of the government gets 
tighter keeping in mind the Viswa Hindu 
Parishad’s Ayodhya kooch. Today the force flag 
marched in the sensitive areas of Ayodhya and 
arrested some karsevaks from their hidings. The 
deployed forces are seeking places to stay even 
in the temples and houses. It may be a sort of 
strategic pretense to see whether some karsevaks 
are hiding in the temples and houses where they 
did get shelter during the previous movements of 
the VHP. The boundaries of Ayodhya and Faizabad 
are already sealed.

  As the result of it the communal forces are 
desparate. The low profile taken by the Chief 
Minister Mulayam Singh Yadov leaves very little 
room for the fiery speeches to impress the public 
and lead them to communal clashes. He has, to the 
surprise of some people, asked the forces not to 
use firing in any case. This has given him a 
liberal image of a changed person in the eyes of 
the common people. In turn it has made the BJP 
leaders to go on the Backfoot.Atal Bihari Vajpai, 
as ever made his double speak, consoling the VHP 
that trains will continue running on the rout of 
Ayodhya on one hand and praising Mulayam Singh on 
the other. He has asserted that the state 
government should have faith in the VHP but has 
also asked to obey the court orders.

It is all due to the diminishing public support 
to the rank and files of the VHP.While the 
orthodox Togariya moves his cannon from the 
central govt to the state govt. the cool BJP 
leaders know that they are locked in a stalemate 
situation. Another firebrand Vinay katiyar seems 
to be changing his previous stance of criticizing 
the government of Vajpai for being hand in gloves 
with Mulayam Singh.As the MP of the area he is 
well aware that the local public will not support 
them this time. So he clashes with Togaria on the 
issue. As a point of strategy the Sangh Parivar 
is trying to maneuver the cadre from the nearby 
areas like Basti, Gonda, Ambedkar Nagar, 
Sultanpur and Barabanki. They know very well that 
it will be very difficult for the forces to stop 
karsevaks infiltering from the adjacent cities 
and rural areas.

But it is very difficult for the cadres of Sangh 
Parivar to convince the general public who seems 
to have come to understand their hidden agenda of 
collecting votes for the coming elections. 
Despite their religious belief in Lord Rama, they 
are losing their faith in the leaders of BJP.One 
tells me with the feeling of disillusionment that 
they did not come to build the temple when there 
were Bhartiya Janta Party chief ministers like 
Ram Prakash or Rajnath Singh. During their times 
BJP was ruling both center and state. This 
demystifies their politics of election gains. You 
cannot befool the general public all the time. 
They have minds of their own and they ask 
questions.

Among the sants of Ayodhya Nritya Gopal Das is 
the only major one to support the VHP and he must 
be feeling alienated .In a conspicuous move sants 
like Gyandas roamed through the muslin dominated 
areas of Ayodhya telling the Muslims not to get 
afraid. Things are changed this time in 
Ayodhya.Trains are passing but without the terror 
some shout of Jai Shree Ram. No bhagwa banners of 
welcome on the houses.  

VHP’s own claims to have collected karsevaks in 
the villages on the outskirts of Faizabad tell 
the story of the public support going down. But 
one cannot be certain of the peaceful passing of 
the DAY although most of the people desire so. It 
is strange that we need a big number of good 
civilians to keep peace, but only a small pack 
can disturb and finish it. Any way it is clear 
that the Hinduttva forces are on the back foot 
but ready to knock down the peacekeeping efforts 
till the last minute.


o o o

The Hindu, Oct 16, 2003
Editorial

Making trouble but going nowhere

THE SHOCK FORCES OF THE Sangh Parivar, 
spearheaded by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, have 
nowhere to go in Ayodhya - having demolished the 
Babri Masjid more than a decade ago but unable to 
take forward the project of building a Ram temple 
on the `disputed' site where the 16th century 
mosque used to stand. This is the essential 
difference between the militant Ramjanmabhoomi 
campaigns of the early 1990s and today. The 
temple building project has met with both legal 
and political obstacles. The legal obstacle is 
the `title' suit and related issues being heard 
by the Allahabad High Court. In March 2003, the 
Supreme Court, in a splendid demonstration of 
judicial impartiality and commitment to the 
secular values enshrined in the Constitution, 
prohibited the Central Government from handing 
the 67.703 acres of land claimed to be 
"undisputed" to a trust or organisation for the 
purpose of constructing a Ram temple. It ordered 
that the "status quo" should be maintained until 
the title suits were adjudicated by the Allahabad 
High Court. The political obstacle is the breadth 
and depth of opposition from political parties to 
handing over the disputed site for the building 
of a temple. Given the apex court's order and the 
repeatedly expressed positions of most of the 
parties that make up the National Democratic 
Alliance, the Vajpayee Government is in no 
position to aid the Ramjanmabhoomi campaign in 
any material way.

Over the past several days, the Mulayam Singh-led 
Government of Uttar Pradesh has made a firm, 
quiet and well-coordinated effort to thwart the 
VHP's threat of holding an unlawful meeting, the 
`Sankalp Sammelan', in Ayodhya on October 17. The 
mass arrest of Sangh Parivar (and Shiv Sena) 
activists, the requisitioning of more than 100 
companies of Central paramilitary forces with the 
cooperation of the Vajpayee Government, the 
sealing of routes to the twin towns of Faizabad 
and Ayodhya by diverting trains and stopping bus 
services - a variety of law enforcement measures 
has been employed to stop potential violence and 
trouble at the disputed site. In enforcing such 
measures, the U.P. Chief Minister, Mulayam Singh 
Yadav, is armed with a potent weapon: a court 
order. Last week's direction by the special bench 
of the Allahabad High Court is unambiguous: the 
State Government must not allow the VHP to 
conduct a religious programme at, or in the 
vicinity of, the disputed site where the Babri 
Masjid once stood. It is notable that in this 
round the U.P. Chief Minister has gone out of his 
way to signal that he is not in favour of any 
confrontation.

The VHP has repeatedly declared that courts have 
no competence to adjudicate `matters of faith'. 
It is no longer a novelty for top VHP leaders to 
shower the Prime Minister with some of their 
choicest abuse and insults. They are on record 
accusing Atal Bihari Vajpayee of "weakening the 
country", of not having "any sentiments" for 
Hindus, of being a deal-maker (for the sake of 
power), a "pseudo-Hindu", an "anti-Hindu", and, 
worst of all, a "secularist". Pravin Togadia, 
international general secretary of the VHP, has 
even warned publicly that the country "will be 
plunged into communal riots" if Ram bhakts are 
stopped from going to Ayodhya for a `darshan'. 
Not surprisingly, the Vajpayee Government has 
come under pressure from the Sangh Parivar, and 
especially its `brain', the Rashtriya Swayamsevak 
Sangh, to come to the aid of the VHP. The top RSS 
leadership has asked the Government not to stop 
or divert trains and not to do anything to 
prevent VHP volunteers from reaching Ayodhya for 
their "sankalp" programme. There has been some 
back-pedalling by the Prime Minister, who has 
suddenly advised that the VHP should be trusted 
to act peacefully. With five Assembly polls a 
little more than a month away and a general 
election due next year, the BJP has a desperate 
political need to keep the Parivar together to 
counter the party's adversaries. In Uttar 
Pradesh, the party's political stock has declined 
to a level that alarms senior leaders. VHP 
leaders make no secret of their assessment that 
the BJP, as presently led, is headed for defeat 
in the next general election - and for a 
near-collapse in U.P. - for the simple reason 
that it has gone `soft' and `effete' on Hindutva. 
The "sankalp" programme might have put some 
pressure on the polity, but its main achievement 
thus far has been to spotlight the contradictions 
and dilemmas faced by the NDA coalition 
Government and its Prime Minister.

o o o

The Times of India, October 16, 2003
Admn has VHP reeling
SRAWAN SHUKLA & VN ARORA
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/uncomp/articleshow?msid=235720

Indian Express, October 16, 2003
VHP show begins with a whimper but early days yet
http://www.indianexpress.com/full_story.php?content_id=33502


_____

[3]

M Hasan Jowher
President
SPRAT [Society for the Promotion of Rational Thinking]
Rajnagar Complex, Narayan Nagar Road, Paldi, Ahmedabad 380 007
Tel 079-663 46 55/66/77 Res: 661 40 95 / 661 20 45
email: <mailto:mhj at mysprat.org>mhj at mysprat.org  Web: mysprat.org
----------------------------------------------------------

SALAAM JUDICIARY - SALAAM INDIA

M Hasan Jowher

Masuma did not live to hear the scolding Narendra 
Modi government received from the Supreme Court. 
She died the same night, when at our bidding, she 
narrated her tale of woe to an international TV 
channel. Recounting the loss of her husband, two 
daughters, her own limbs and house at Naroda Gam 
proved unbearable. We killed her but don't feel 
guilty. She was too miserable to live.

The thousands of other riot victims of Gujarat 
riots drew some satisfaction from the indictment 
Gujarat Government received from the Supreme 
Court in the Best Bakery and Bilkis rape cases. 
After the genocide celebrating yatras, denial of 
compensation and justice, and visible state 
animosity comes some ray of hope.

Continuing violence and persecution, collapse of 
justice system and witch hunting of those who 
worked for the victims, have further alienated 
Gujarat's largest minority. Of the 240 held under 
POTA one is a Sikh, the rest are all Muslims.

Sycophantic bureaucracy and spineless police abet 
a decadent administration of Gujarat in 
persecuting and even prosecuting the victims 
themselves through unabashed misuse of law even 
while sections of judiciary look the other way. 
The Police often use Muslim goons, passing for 
local leaders, in perpetuating this stranglehold. 
As I write this dozens of innocent Muslims of 
Ahmedabad are said to be held in illegal custody 
for periods ranging from five to fifty days. 
Alas, no one speaks for them.  No wonder 
retaliatory terrorism, however 
counter-productive, has gained some sub-conscious 
legitimacy. But in Gujarat government's lexicon 
killing of twenty innocents by two armed 
desperadoes is terrorism while the killing of two 
hundred innocents by a mob of two thousand 
marauders is "natural reaction".

It is in this background that the nation's 
conscience keeper has reminded Modi Government of 
its Rajdharma. It is time for the 'Adharmi 
sarkar' to quit in remorse for the sake of 
Gujarat's asmita and gaurav. Will the civil 
servants also now wake up to their duty?

Implicit in the Supreme Court observations is 
also the emphatic assertion for the Muslims of 
India: Look within for justice; relief and 
support is next door from your Hindu neighbors 
and not from pan-Islamic fraternity beyond. The 
state may have betrayed you but the nation has 
not turned a blind eye. That the soul of India is 
intact. And disturbed.

Caught between the vice-like grip of an 
unimaginative and opportunistic leadership on the 
one hand and majoritarian extremism on the other, 
the common Indian Muslim today lives in a 
pitiable situation. Firmly rooted, yet uprooted; 
with a glorious heritage, a dismal present and a 
bleak future; branded traitors and terrorists, 
Muslims of India are undoubtedly the suffering 
children of the subcontinent's painful recent 
history.

Before Graham Stains a Muslim was similarly burnt 
to death in Orissa; no one heard about him. The 
killers of over 2000 Gujarati Muslims are most 
likely to go scot-free. Meerut, Bhagalpur, 
Bhiwandi, Bombay.. no one was punished, as Modi 
government reminded the court. But if Bush can 
hunt Saddam inside Iraq, if Sharon can imprison 
Arafat in Palestine, why can Modi not subjugate 
Gujarati Muslims? How will the ill-trusted 
Nanavati commission be more effective than the 
conscientious Justice Shri Krishna commission?

Yet, the ilk of Togadia has successfully 
convinced the majority that the Indian Muslim is 
an appeased lot. Some Gujarati Hindus genuinely 
believe that the genocide has actually benefited 
Muslims through compensation and insurance 
claims! Lagging behind in almost every facet of 
contemporary life, Indian Muslims have been on 
the defensive for far too long, thanks largely to 
their own misplaced priorities. One hundred fifty 
million Muslims of India sadly lack an 
organizational structure and a courageous, 
visionary leadership that can challenge the 
bigots and address the real issues of poverty, 
illiteracy, irrationality, obscurantism.

Consider that the three lakh residents of 
Ahmedabad's Muslim Juhpaura do not have one 
nationalized bank branch, a college, a single 
public utility office or government hospital. 
When some hooligans attacked a bus, the 
government changed the transport route skirting 
Juhapura by four extra kilometers. A whole 
generation of Ahmedabadi Hindus has grown without 
ever visiting Juhapura.

Isn't is time the Muslims turned the tables and 
aggressively presented to the nation a Muslim 
Charter espousing their secular cause with all 
the strength the Indian republic bestows, with 
all the cooperation the conscientious Hindus will 
undoubtedly extend?

With extensive credible evidence in support, they 
should demand fair and equal opportunities in the 
temporal life of the nation. To bridge the gap 
they need preferential treatment in credit, 
education, sanitation, employment and 
representation in government. Muslims shall not 
be second grade citizens of India. They must 
contribute and share in the prosperity of the 
nation as equal citizens. No need for ritualistic 
secularism: condemning every terrorist act, 
distancing from community causes. For this, of 
course, their commitment to the nation, the next 
door Hindu friend and to secularism at large 
should be sincere and unflinching.

To win Gujarati Muslim mind and heart justice 
should be done and seen. A special federal 
investigating and prosecuting agency comprising 
well-known secular police officers and lawyers 
nominated by NHRC should probe the entire Godhra 
and post Godhra violence. A statutory 
compensation commission should be set up to 
solicit, investigate and grant fair and 
contemporaneous compensation for losses suffered 
by all victims. A reconciliation commission may 
also be set up at the national level to promote 
interfaith and inter-caste harmony, reuniting the 
fragmented Indian society into an emotionally 
unified nation.

The Supreme Court has shown a direction. Masooma 
is gone but Bilkis lives with her shame and pain. 
To salute the dead, to celebrate life, to the 
spirit of unity amidst diversity; humanity amidst 
bigotry; reason, truth and justice against 
fanaticism, falsehood and injustice, on this day 
an Indian Muslim offers salaam.

The writer is the Founder President of SPRAT 
[Society for the Promotion of Rational Thinking] 
- a voluntary organization -  and may be reached 
at mhj at mysprat.org.



_____

[4.]


[GOA, INDIA] GOVERNOR  HIGHLIGHTS IMPORTANCE OF THE RE-CONSTRUCTION OF TEMPLES

October 11, 2003 (Department of Information)

Governor Mr. Kidar Nath Sahani has said that the re-construction of temples
demolished by the Portuguese and erstwhile regimes has great importance in
the nation building task and in bringing about national awakening among the
people.

Mrs. Vimla Sahani also accompanied the Governor.

The Governor was speaking to the people when he visited the old site of
Shree Mahalsa temple at Verna. The re-construction of Mahalsa temple has
been taken up at Verna at a cost of Rs. 4 Crores.  The old temple was
demolished in the year 1567 by the Portuguese. Besides the main temple of
Shree Mahalsa other small temples of Shree Sateri, Ganesh, Mahalaxmi and
Nagadevata will also be constructed. The work has been entrusted to M/s K.
V. Nadkarni and Associates, Architect Abhijit Sadhale, Consultant engineers
Mr.R. M. Dhume, Mr. Manoj Amshekar .

Speaking further Mr. Sahani said, people from all faiths should come
together and extend cooperation in this mammoth task as it involves issue of
national identity and heritage. He said re-construction of a temple is a
noble task and there should be no difficulty in getting funds for the
project.

He also advised the committte members to approach the managements of other
temples in Goa and seek their help.

Mr. Devidas Saraf welcomed the guests. Mr. Yeshwant Paradkar took around the
Governor and Mrs. Vimla Sahani and explained about the construction work and
also the brief history. Mr. Shaba Verekar compared and Mr. Anand Dessai
proposed vote of thanks.

Prof. Subhash Velinkar, Vice President of the Committee, Mr. Nitin
Kuncoliekar, President, GCCI, Mr Ratnakr Lele, Mr. Prakash Kawlekar, and
President South Goa Vishwa Hindu Parishad were among those present on the
occasion.


_____


[5]

South India Coalition for Sexuality Rights
Flat 13, Royal Park Apartments, 34 Park Road, Tasker Town, Bangalore -
560051
Phone: 080 2868680/2868121 Email: <sicsr at hotmail.com>
=========================

                             PRESS RELEASE

     Bangalore
     14th October, 2003

     Subject: Launching of 'South India Coalition for Sexuality Rights' and
     'Campaign for Repealing of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC'

     Around 100 activists belonging to various organizations working on issues
     related to sexuality minorities, sex-workers, 
women, dalits, human rights, sexual
     health, trade unions, students, youth, social 
action etc.. in South India have
     gathered in Bangalore for a full-day 
deliberations on the issue of Repealing
     Section 377 of IPC. The groups have resolved 
to launch a campaign to sensitize
     the state, media and the civil society about 
the need to Repeal Section 377 of the
     IPC, the law used to criminalize 
homosexual/bisexual/transsexual people. IPC
     377 is used often by police and criminal 
elements to harass, abuse (physical as
     well as sexual), extort and intimidate homosexual/bisexual/transsexual
     populations. This law stands as a hindrance in seeking justice when human
     rights of sexuality minorities are violated. 
This law even criminalizes certain
     forms of sexual activities between consenting 
heterosexual adults like 'oral sex'
     and 'anal sex'.

     This archaic law was imposed on our sexually 
tolerant society 135 years ago by
     British colonial rulers. Though Britain has decriminalized homosexuality 50
     years ago, we continue to serve our erstwhile masters through this law. The
     recent affidavit filed by the central 
government in Delhi High Court stated that
     "homosexuality should not be decriminalized 
because: 1) Homosexuality is not
     accepted by Indian culture and Society, 2) 
Criminalisation of homosexuality is
     necessary to "provide a healthy environment 
by criminalizing unnatural sexual
     activities" and also, that "it can open the 
floodgates of delinquent behavior", 3)
     The criminal law should represent the wishes 
of majority of the population and
     homosexuality should be a crime as a majority 
of Indian are intolerant towards
     it" (emphasis added). This only shows how the present central government,
     which claims to uphold the Indian traditions 
is actually a reactionary force, and
     has very little understanding of tolerant Indian traditions towards
     homosexuality. What gives us hope is the positive support extended by the
     visual/print media through editorials, reports, talk shows etc..

     The activists at the Bangalore meeting have 
launched ‘South India Coalition for
     Sexuality Rights’ to fight not only for the 
rights of sexuality minorities but also
     for the rights of all people who are facing 
oppression due to sexual intolerance
     including sex-workers and people living with HIV/AIDS through public
     education and campaigns. The constituents of 
the coalition include: Alternative
     Law Forum (ALF), DISC, Federation of Voluntary Organisations for Rural
     Development in Karnataka (FEVORD-K), Garment Workers Union, Gelaya,
     Good As You, Indian Social Institute, Jagruthi, NESA (New Entity for Social
     Action), PUCL – Karnataka, Sakya Balaga, Samraksha, Sangama, Saturday Sex-
     workers’ forum, Queer IISc (Queers in Indian 
Institute of Science) and Vividha
     from Karnataka); Sexworkers’ Forum Kerala, Vaathil and Foundation for
     Integrated Research in Mental Health (FIRM) from Kerala; Social Working
     Association for Men (SWAM) and Theni Mavattam Aravanigal Association
     from Tamilnadu, Darpan Foundation, Duties, 
Jyothi Welfare Society, Mithrudu,
     PASCA, Saathi and WINS (Women's Initiatives) from Andhra Pradesh.

     We request you to carry this news in your 
publication/television in support of
     our struggle for equality and justice.

     Yours truly,

     Elavarthi Manohar, Maitreya
     for Coordination Committee


______


[6]

[ANNOUNCEMENT]

Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 13:37:43 +0530

Subject: Sex Selection: Issues and concerns

Dear Friends,

We have come out with a new publication titled 
"Sex Selection: Issues and concerns".

This book is a collection of papers, articles and 
news reports. The purpose of this compilation is 
to bring together various points of view and 
voices that have shaped the sex selection debate 
to date. The writings in the volume are broadly 
divided into four sections.

'Sex selection and the Campaign' traces the 
rising concern over sex selection across time. It 
puts into focus crucial debates that eventually 
led to the genesis of the campaign against sex 
determination. The section also comprises of 
papers studying the extent to which such a 
practice prevails.

'Role of the state and the law' deals with the 
role of state and the legal battle towards a ban 
on the practice from the formulation of the 
Maharashtra Regulation of Use of Prenatal 
Diagnostic Technique Act, 1988 to the Pre Natal 
Diagnostic Tests (Regulation and Prohibition of 
Misuse) Act, 194,

'Social Impact of Sex Selection practice' looks 
at the impact such rampant practice of sex 
determination has on demographic indicators.

'The political Economy of sex selection' looks at 
the social, cultural, economic and political 
aspects linked to the prevalence of such a 
practice.

Cost of the publications is Rs. 125/-

For copies write to:

<cehat at vsnl.com>
<cehatpun at vsnl.com>


______


[7]


Financial Times [UK]
October 14, 2003, Tuesday London Edition 2
Pg. 24

India beckons as a test-bed for western drug 
companies: Groups see the chance for big savings 
but questions are raised about the ethics of 
trials on illiterate patients, writes Ray Marcelo

By RAY MARCELO

Harmala Gupta runs a cancer patient care and 
counselling service in New Delhi, but she is 
worried that many patients have little say in 
their treatment.

"Patients with lower social status are treated as 
if they have a basic inability to understand or 
even have feelings," she says. "I've heard young 
doctors saying it's so easy to do research on 
these people. But if you don't see people as 
people, but as case studies, it becomes 
exploitative."

Ms Gupta's concern for her patients serves as an 
ethical reminder for multinational pharmaceutical 
companies that hope to cut drug development costs 
by recruiting Indian patients for clinical trials.

The reality of clinical trials - the approval 
process for any new pharmaceutical - is that they 
are time-consuming, expensive, and ethically 
tricky. The task involves recruiting hundreds, 
often thousands, of sick people to volunteer for 
the testing of experimental medicines, with 
unknown side effects.

This makes India, with a population of more than 
1bn and no shortage of diseases, an attractive 
destination for contract research organisations, 
businesses that run trials for pharmaceuticals 
groups.

The aim is to reduce the time and money needed to 
turn new molecules into marketable drugs: a 
process that can take 20 years and cost Dollars 
800m (Pounds 480m).

Peter Pfeiffer, associate principal with 
consultancy McKinsey, told an industry conference 
in New Delhi: "The overall cost advantage in 
bringing a drug to market by leveraging India 
aggressively could be as high as Dollars 200m.

"India clearly provides an opportunity for 
western pharmaceuticals companies . . . because 
of the availability of large patient populations, 
access to highly educated talent and a lower cost 
of operations."

These developments come when pharmaceuticals 
companies are beginning to consider transferring 
parts of their research operations to India. It 
is attractive because of its many scientists and 
the fact that it is implementing tougher patent 
protection. The companies are keenly searching 
for ways to increase the productivity of their 
research. Some executives believe India could 
become as prominent in pharmaceuticals as it is 
in information technology.

In clinical trials, India, unlike the US, offers 
an enormous pool of what the industry calls 
"treatment-naive" patients - those who have not 
been tested with rival drugs. A larger pool of 
such people offers the prospect of faster patient 
enrolment in trials and thus more rapid drug 
development.

India has about 30m people with heart disease, 
25m with type-II diabetes and 10m with 
psychiatric disorders, according to Centerwatch, 
a trade magazine. The abundance of these 
supposedly "rich-world" diseases is regarded as a 
prize attribute for companies looking to test 
drugs destined for western consumers.

The world's largest CRO, US-based Quintiles, 
began operations in India in 1997, and has 
recruited 6,400 patients for clinical trials in 
areas such as psychiatry, infectious diseases and 
oncology. Centerwatch estimates there are a dozen 
CROs that have set up offices in India, up from 
three in 2001.

Mike Ryan, business development manager of New 
Jersey-based CRO Pharmanet, which has been in 
India for about a year, says one of the country's 
attractions is that patients hold doctors in high 
esteem. As a result, patient compliance in trials 
is high - as opposed to the US, where subjects 
often drop out to seek second opinions.

Indian companies, too, are angling for a share of 
contract research. Cathy White, chief executive 
of Neeman Medical International, a US-based 
subsidiary of India's Max Healthcare group, says 
companies can save 20-30 per cent in drug 
development costs by outsourcing to India.

Most of these savings come from hiring clinical 
researchers, nurses and IT staff at less than a 
third of western wages.

Another factor underpinning the shift of drug 
testing to India is the recent change in medical 
research rules. India's health authorities this 
year adopted guidelines on "good clinical 
practice" in line with global norms.

Still, some inside the industry express caution. 
Urmilla Thattle, associate professor at Tamil 
Nadu's medical college, argues that if patients 
are illiterate, there are serious ethical 
questions surrounding their consent in a drug 
trial.

She says she has seen hospital ethics committees 
using photocopied consent forms irrelevant to the 
proposed drug trial.

Allan Weinstein, vice-president of clinical 
research and regulatory affairs with US drugmaker 
Eli Lilly, says: "India should not be a place to 
go just because there are a lot of fresh 
patients." He says there must be a likelihood 
that patients involved in a clinical trial will 
benefit from the drug.

LOAD-DATE: October 13, 2003


______


[8]

FOCUS ON INTERNET CENSORSHIP IN INDIA
http://membres.lycos.fr/sacw/   [Updated on October 16, 2003]

Beat the ban on groups.yahoo.com
by using any of the following proxies (any users 
reports would be welcome: please send reports to 
aiindex at mnet.fr)

Readers outside India are requested to help point 
at other possible proxy servers

http://free2.surffreedom.com/nph-free.cgi/000000A/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://invis.free.anonymizer.com/http://groups.yahoo.com/
http://anonymouse.ws/cgi-bin/anon-www_de.cgi/http://groups.yahoo.com/ 
(Advertisement)
http://203.26.19.30/proxy/proxy.pl/000000A/http/groups.yahoo.com/ 
(Without images)
http://ground0.hypermart.net/nph-cyberanon.cgi/http://groups.yahoo.com/
http://www.mdsme.de/cgi-bin/nph-spinnerproxy.cgi/111111A/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://www.dumpfbacke.de/cgi-bin/mdsme-II/nph-spinnerproxy.cgi/111110A/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://www.pureprivacy.com/ (Advertisement)
http://www.marzie.com/webtools/proxybuster/browse.asp?url=http://groups.yahoo.com/ 
(Advertisement)
http://www.mckendree.edu/scripts/nph-proxy.cgi/111110A/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://pasty.hypermart.net/cgi-bin/nph-proxy.cgi/111110A/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://203.26.19.30/proxy/nph-proxy.pl/111110A/http://groups.yahoo.com/
http://www.tku.ac.jp/~99e1330/cgi-bin/nph-proxy.cgi/111/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://proxy.drkangel.com/nph-index.cgi/111110A/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://www.anonymization.net/1/1/A/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://brianwiese.net/cgi-bin/nph-proxy.cgi/000010A/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://www.wgbh.org:81/cgi-bin/nph-algs.cgi/011111A/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://www.vbdesign.net/cgi-bin/nph-proxy.cgi/111110A/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://www.jetropolis.com/cgi-bin/nph-proxy.cgi/000000A/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://digitalizedzone.com/cgiproxy/nph-proxy.pl/111110A/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://www.rocketstable.com/nph-proxy.cgi/111110A/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://unfeomateo.com/cgiproxy/nph-proxy.pl/000100A/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://www.morgurch.com/nph-proxy.cgi/000100A/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://www.joelkimble.com/cgi-bin/nph-proxy.pl/000100A/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://ym2400z.virtualave.net/cgi-bin/cgiproxy131/nph-proxy.cgi/000/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://glass.ipe.tsukuba.ac.jp/~s011304/cgi/nph-proxy.cgi/000010A/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://ef-chat.hypermart.net/jiimbo-jones/nph-browse.pl/000010A/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://www.anonsurf.de/cgi-bin/nph-asurf.cgi/000100A/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://www.spunge.org/~hyperwar/nph-proxy.cgi/000000A/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://www.boyscorp.com/prx/nph-proxy.cgi/000/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://www.thinksquad.com/cgi-bin/nph-proxy.cgi/000110A/http/groups.yahoo.com/
http://www.hostsite.org/proxy/nph-proxy.pl/000000A/http/groups.yahoo.com/



_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

Buzz on the perils of fundamentalist politics, on 
matters of peace and democratisation in South 
Asia. SACW is an independent & non-profit 
citizens wire service run since 1998 by South 
Asia Citizens Web (www.mnet.fr/aiindex). [Please 
note the SACW web site has gone down, you will 
have to for the time being search google cache 
for materials]
The complete SACW archive is available at: http://sacw.insaf.net
South Asia Counter Information Project a sister 
initiative provides a partial back -up and 
archive for SACW. http://perso.wanadoo.fr/sacw/

DISCLAIMER: Opinions expressed in materials carried in the posts do not
necessarily reflect the views of SACW compilers.

-- 



More information about the Sacw mailing list