SACW | 3 SEPT. 2003

Harsh Kapoor aiindex at mnet.fr
Wed Sep 3 05:06:25 CDT 2003


South Asia Citizens Wire  |  3 September,  2003

[1.] Bangladesh: The Ugly Head of Fanaticism (edit, Bangladesh Observer)
+  background material on Bangladesh High Court's anti-Fatwa 
judgement + on illegal fatwas in Bangladesh
[2.] Sri Lanka: What happened to the Domestic Violence Bill?
[3.] Indian bomb blasts: the end product of communal politics (Sarath Kumara)
[4.] India: Journalists Union condemns VHP, police for harassing 
Gilani, asks to arrest guilty
[5.] India: Extracts from the report submitted by the ASI on the 
excavation carried out in Ayodhya
[6.] India: Interview with Farooque Shaikh ; "That's what the Third 
Reich was all about"
[7.] India: Please stop branding us terrorists: Muslim areas in 
Ahmedabad shut down, silently
[8.] India: Dalits, Vote Bank, Violence (I.K.Shukla)
[9.] India: World Social Forum - Gujarat
[10.]Invitation to Bombay Workshop on reform of the Criminal Justice System
And release of Justice H. Suresh's Book "Fundamental Rights as Human Rights"
[11.] The 'Hinduising' Secular India Show: Coming soon in your neighborhood !:
- Ganesha does what politics couldn't
- VHP to educate people about designs of terrorists
- VHP prepares kar seva kit for Saurashtra
- Sangh outfits suggest WTO alternatives

--------------

[1.]

The Bangladesh Observer, September 3, 2003
Editorial

The Ugly Head Of Fanaticism 

The recent reactionary statement given by Mufti Fazlul Huq Aminee, 
MP, against Dr Kamal Hossain's previously-made speech bears a host of 
significant ramifications. The MP termed the contents of the speech 
anti-Islamic that has hurt the sentiments of the country's 130 
million Muslims. And then he escalated to-and this is a shameful 
trait in the average Bangladeshi-bringing in extraneous negative 
appendages to bolster his verbal assault on the lawyer-politician. 
Therefore, Bangladeshis were reminded that Kamal Hossain was in 
favour of the High Court's anti-Fatwa judgement, and were supplied 
the information that purports him, with all his Western degrees, to 
be God-less. The Mufti also moved from the personal indictment to 
matters political. And, in this context, he made the point that none 
could form a national government without the support of the Islamic 
parties. Furthermore, he contemptuously dismissed the left-leaning 
parties as existing without any popular sup-port, but which are 
propped up by a few urban intellectuals. Aminee has accused them as 
being agents of some Indian plan to turn Bangladesh into one of its 
federated states. Even allowing for the rhetoric that routinely 
ac-companies public political speech, the MP's statement has worrying 
aspects that are at odds with the very ideas of individual freedom 
and secular democracy.

The very fact that Hossain has been accused of making an anti-Islamic 
speech, not to mention the tasteless and random portrayal of him as 
being God-less, when the lawyer had only highlighted the deleterious 
effects of Islamic fanaticism only emphasizes the validity of 
Hossain's contention. The rigid intolerance of criticism against 
fanaticism and political parties adhering to the narrowest and 
shallowest interpretation of a great religion translates to damaging 
name-calling and character assassination. As a very natural 
corollary, supporting a High Court decision becomes a crime only 
because it does not agree with the views of the strictly 
religion-based parties and fanatical individuals. Those are fascistic 
sentiments coming from political organizations functioning in a 
liberal democracy (however flawed), but which exhibit (and profess) a 
contempt for liberal democratic viewpoints. Aminee may be on the 
money in describing the left-leaning parties as organizations with 
little public support, but labeling them and their urban intellectual 
backers as Indian agents out to sell their country equally invites 
this legitimate question: then, with their fundamentalist agenda, 
just whose interests are the religion-based parties serving? And do 
not say the cause of Islam, because they often do great disservice to 
a noble religion and its vast multitude of devout, tolerant and 
secular adherents. Furthermore, their accusation belittles the 
overwhelming majority of Bangladeshis who would sacrifice a lot 
before becoming a part of another country.

The most troubling aspect of Aminee's tirade, how-ever, is his 
assertion that none can form a national government without the 
backing of the Islamic parties. This is dangerous thinking because it 
is palpably faulty and yet draws the mainstream parties into negative 
and defensive posture. As the recent local level elections will show, 
the unofficial party affiliations of the winners depict a 
statistically insignificant return for the Islamic parties. When 
juxtaposed with the surveys conducted on the voting pattern of the 
last parliamentary elections, the picture that clearly emerges is one 
of the religion-based parties being in a firm minority. They are only 
creating an illusion of weightage. They are numerical featherweights, 
but project the appearance of heavyweights to the major parties who, 
including the current main opposition, seem mesmerized into 
soliciting their help come election time. The major parties are at 
fault in anointing the minor religion-based parties with an aura of 
grave majority. These minors can, and should, be shunned if secular 
liberal democracy is to establish itself as a polity in Bangladesh. 
They are as detrimental to Bangladesh as are the minority 
religion-based organizations that are engaged in vilifying the image 
of the vastly tolerant Bangladesh people.

o o o

[Related Background Material that might interest readers:

(i)  Bangladesh: Landmark High Court ruling against fatwas
Amnesty International (INDEX: ASA 13/001/2001     5 January 2001) 
http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGASA130012001?open&of=ENG-BGD

(ii)

Fatwas Against Women in Bangladesh
WLUML (Published: 1996)
http://www.wluml.org/english/pubs/pdf/misc/fatwa-bangladesh-eng.pdf  ]

_____


[2.]

The Island [Sri Lanka] 3 Sept. 2003
Cat's Eye
What happened to the Domestic Violence Bill?

Time and time and time again we are informed by NGOs working with 
victims of domestic violence, or by statistics available at the 
Police Department, the Samatha Mandalayas (Mediation Boards) or by 
research studies that there is a high prevalence of domestic violence 
in Sri Lanka. There is indeed a possibility that the reportage of 
domestic violence has increased in recent times, but there is no 
escaping the fact that it is one of the most frequently committed 
offences in the home and the least dealt with seriously.

Sri Lanka has at present, no single law that deals specifically with 
domestic violence. Criminal law can be invoked in cases of domestic 
violence, but this very rarely happens in practice. As the incidence 
of domestic violence keeps rising in the country, the debate about 
what legal mechanisms should be used to deal with it has also been 
waxing and waning.

Two approaches to a solution have been discussed over the years. One 
suggested amendments to existing criminal law arguing that 
enforcement will be taken more seriously if domestic violence is 
articulated as a Penal Code offence. The second favoured a separate 
law which would combine both criminal and civil remedies. While both 
women and men are victims of domestic violence and there is no age, 
class, caste, creed or ethnic barrier to the committing of the 
offence it is also a fact that women suffer the brunt of violence in 
the home and in intimate relationships. Many women victims felt that 
both civil and criminal remedies should be available to deal with the 
problem. (Surprising as it may be to some, not all women wanted their 
abusive men folk imprisoned).

As the discussions went back and forth women's groups together with 
other concerned groups and individuals proposed the enactment of 
separate legislation to deal with domestic violence. The Women and 
Media Collective facilitated this process and introduced a draft for 
public discussion in early 2000. This draft (the women's draft) 
incorporated elements from similar legislation available 
internationally especially South Africa and Malaysia and the Lawyers 
Collective Bill from India. It was also based on the framework for 
domestic violence legislation proposed by the UN Special Rapporteur 
on Violence Against Women.

Discussion of draft

The women's draft went through many rounds of discussions and 
amendments with the participation of women's groups working at 
community level, human rights activists, lawyers, doctors, medical 
professionals, the media, etc. and other concerned individuals.

Over the two years, it was also considered by the Ministry of Justice 
and the Ministry of Women's Affairs in Sri Lanka. In May 2002 the 
Ministry of Justice unveiled its own draft Bill on Domestic Violence. 
This draft Bill (the MoJ draft) sought to deal with just one aspect 
of a remedy. As stated in the draft it was for the 'making of 
protection orders in instances of domestic violence and for matters 
connected therewith or incidental thereto'.

The MoJ draft incorporates some of the elements in the women's draft, 
deletes some and adds others. Women's groups discussed this new draft 
in the limited time available to them before it was sent up to 
cabinet and made a series of recommendations for amendment. The 
Ministry of Women's Affairs also found the MoJ draft insufficient in 
some aspects and made their own recommendations seeking to strengthen 
it. The last we heard was that the MoJ draft was considered by a 
Cabinet sub-committee and returned to the Ministry of Justice for 
revision.

The women's draft took two years of consultative discussions, mostly 
with persons directly affected by domestic violence and persons 
dealing with the issue of domestic violence, to draw up and fine 
tune. The Ministry of Justice, we understand, had the elements of a 
draft ready from before that which were finally incorporated into a 
Bill in 2002. We have two comprehensive documents in hand, both of 
which obviously took much thought and effort to put together. Why 
then have we not seen a final draft Bill? Why has an amended draft 
not been circulated as yet for discussion? Why waste the years of 
work that has gone into thinking about a suitable legal remedy? What 
is the problem? Where in the process is the draft stuck at?

When the women's draft was being prepared and discussed among women 
affected by domestic violence, one of the pleas was that civil 
remedies be included together with criminal action. Most women sought 
a means to be protected from violence at home and most sought a space 
of refuge when violence could not be prevented.

Definition

The women's draft therefore incorporated both civil and criminal 
remedies. It recognized that women, men and children have the right 
to be free from all forms of domestic violence. It sought to 
carefully define the meaning and the location of domestic violence. 
Domestic Violence was seen to encompass all forms of physical, 
sexual, psychological, emotional, verbal and economic abuse 
perpetrated in a domestic setting.

Emotional abuse was defined to include degrading or humiliating 
conduct, including repeated threats to cause pain to a person or a 
relative. Economic abuse was defined to include the unreasonable 
deprivation of economic or financial resources that a person 
requires, including access to bank accounts and the right to dispose 
of property.

The MoJ draft however sought not to define domestic violence but 
linked it to offenses in the penal code. It did in addition introduce 
the concept of emotional abuse.

This lack of a clear definition is seen as a major drawback by 
women's groups. The link to the penal code is also seen as 
detrimental. The fundamental concern of the MoJ draft is to enable 
persons affected by domestic violence to secure an immediate interim 
protection order. If there is no clear definition of the act of 
domestic violence written into the law, it is feared that Magistrates 
may miss some of the more sensitive aspects of domestic violence. 
Women in particular are extremely conscious of the strong 
socialization that prevails in our society among both men and women 
that is biased in favour of patriarchal notions of women's status and 
place in society, especially in the home. This leads often to women 
being blamed for the crimes being committed against them, found fault 
with and called upon to comply with 'social norms' and 'obligations' 
to prevent the crime. A raped woman is often accused of having 'asked 
for it' by being out at night or in 'inappropriate' places; or having 
dressed provocatively; or having a 'questionable past', etc. This in 
most people's minds gives the rapist the license to rape. (when 
making this argument, women note that it is also conveniently 
forgotten that babies and toddlers as well as girl children and 
grandmothers, who never wore a slit skirt or frequented a nightclub, 
in their life, get raped).

Domestic violence a private affair?

Similarly with domestic violence, the most common reaction is that it 
is a private affair; that a man is entitled to beat some discipline 
into his wife; that a woman is bound to be dutiful and obedient and 
that publicizing domestic violence would lead to 'family breakdown'. 
Another often used excuse is poverty and alcoholism. It is a myth 
that rich men don't beat women and it is an equal myth that men beat 
others only when they are drunk. While alcoholism is a problem that 
has to be dealt with separately if cannot be used as an excuse for 
domestic violence. (As a woman victim said to us, responding to the 
question of alcoholism, my husband beats me and the children when he 
is drunk, but he doesn't beat our neighbour or his wife). So the 
bottom line is that women should just get raped and beaten quietly so 
that the status quo is not disturbed, especially the status quo 
within the family. This is precisely the reason why we ask that to be 
realistically implementable any legislation on domestic violence must 
incorporate an inclusive definition of the offence.

Who can make a complaint?

The women's draft also called for provision to enable the victim or a 
person on behalf of a victim to make a complaint of domestic violence 
before a magistrate. We think this is a provision that should be 
allowed, of course with the requisite safeguards to prevent misuse. 
Many studies indicate that part of the cycle of violence against 
victims of domestic violence is the reluctance to talk about the 
offence for fear of retaliation. This is the very fear that keeps the 
cycle going and allows for no protection of the victim, particularly 
victims of repeated violence who may finally die at the hands of the 
perpetrator.

Services for victims

Another very important element that needs to be incorporated into 
legislation on domestic violence is the most essential remedy that 
seeks to provide services to the victim. This is the true measure of 
political willingness to deal with the issue of domestic violence. 
The law has therefore to also demand the provision of services such 
as shelters, legal assistance and counseling to victims of violence.

Attitudinal change

There must also be provisions made to sensitize law enforcement and 
medico-legal personnel dealing with domestic violence on the gravity 
of the offence and the gender imperatives of the offence of domestic 
violence. The law and its effective enforcement can be one of the 
most crucial measures to bring about much needed attitudinal change 
on the issue of domestic violence. When justice is seen to be done 
and the offence vindicated, it is only then that public attitudes 
about violence (all forms of violence) and particularly domestic 
violence will be taken seriously. This will be the first step that 
will bring real protection to victims, begin the process of 
attitudinal change and finally ensure prevention.

Consultative process

The Domestic Violence Bill is one piece of legislation that has been 
drafted through discussion. As we noted earlier the MoJ draft took in 
elements from the Women's Draft which itself was discussed in many 
parts of the country, with different ethnic communities, class and 
religious communities and legal and medical professionals. The final 
version of the government draft is in the process of revision. Can we 
ask the Ministry of Justice to make this process of revision a 
consultative one as well? A member of the South African Women's 
Commission visiting Sri Lanka recently spoke of how the South African 
draft Bill on Domestic Violence went through an extensive process of 
discussion up and down the country before it was passed into law. She 
highlighted the merits of getting 'good law' into the Statute books 
and said that the best route to go was through an open process of 
discussion and inclusion. As with South Africa, Sri Lanka too is 
going through a period of transformation. But unlike South Africa we 
have an excellent Women's Charter to base our work on and we have 
national machinery dealing with women's affairs as well as 
gender-aware and concerned staff at the Ministry of Justice. So let 
us bring out the draft Domestic Violence Bill and shape it to be a 
model and enabling piece of legislation to deal effectively with 
domestic violence.

______


[3.]

wsws.org  | 1 September 2003

Indian bomb blasts: the end product of communal politics
By Sarath Kumara

Two devastating bomb blasts in Bombay, India's financial centre, last 
week claimed the lives of at least 52 people and injured more than 
150. One exploded at the Zaveri Bazaar, the city's jewelry district, 
near the Hindu Mumbadevi temple. The other blast took place near one 
of the city's main tourist attractions-the Gateway of India-a British 
monument built during the colonial rule of India.
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/sep2003/indi-s01.shtml

_____


[4.]

http://www.keralanext.com/ |  30-August-2003

Journalists Union condemns VHP, police for harassing Gilani, asks to 
arrest guilty

NEW DELHI: The Delhi Union of Journalists on Saturday criticised the 
Vishwa Hindu Parishad and the Delhi police for harassing Kashmir 
Times Delhi bureau chief Iftikhar Gilani while covering a VHP rally 
on Wednessday and demanded action against culprits.

Gilani was beaten up by VHP ''goons'' while covering the rally at 
Jantar Manter and thereafter the police instead of arresting the 
culprits chose to detain him for ''daring to cover a VHP function,'' 
DUJ president S K Pande said.

Though an assistant commissioner of police subsequently apologised 
and let off Gilani, DUJ has demanded an inquiry into the illegal 
detention for an hour despite showing his PIB accreditation card to 
prove that he was a bonafide journalist. Pande also demanded the 
arrest of those who assaulted Gilani.

DUJ urged the Government to provide protection to journalists in 
performing their duty fearlessly and ensure that incidents like the 
assault on Gilani was not repeated.

''why the police was vindictive with Gilani who was earlier also 
falsely implicated in an official secrets act case resulting in his 
detention in Tihar jail for seven months?'' DUJ wondered and pointed 
out that the charges had subesquently could not stand scrutiny.

''How long will I continue to be harassed?'' Geelani asked when contacted.

The DUJ president also condemned the VHP for first inviting the media 
for coverage of its activists and then assualting selected 
journalists. He warned that the media would boycott the coverage of 
VHP if such incidents were repeated in future.

"The VHP has a history of inviting journalists for coverage and then 
assaulting them as it happened in 1992 in Ayodhya when the press 
cards issued by the VHP came handy to identify and beat up the 
journalists. Those who did not carry their cards could escape for 
want of identification,'' DUJ pointed out.


_____


[5.]

What lies beneath disputed structure
Extracts from the 574-page report submitted by the ASI on the 
excavation carried out in Ayodhya
http://www.indianexpress.com/full_story.php?content_id=30715

____


[6.]

The Times of India, September 2. 2003
MINORITY REPORT

At a crowded meeting in Mumbai last week, the city's Muslim 
intellectuals spoke about the community's disapproval of terrorist 
acts. But film, stage and TV actor Farooque Shaikh questioned the 
necessity for Muslims as a community to condemn every act of 
terrorism. Shaikh, who's active in citizens' peace initiatives, spoke 
to Jyoti Punwani about his irritation at his community's tendency to 
proclaim ''what should be taken as given'':


Your speech at the meeting raised quite a few eyebrows. What exactly 
did you say?

All I said was we are wasting our time  and energy stating the 
obvious every time. I would have preferred us spending time in 
helping those who suffered in the blasts by either raising funds or 
organising a blood donation drive.

Condemnation of such incidents has come  to be expected of Muslims.

But how many times must we do so? Every time something happens, must 
we undergo this trial by fire? Should it become part of our social 
psyche? I think the fact that we  do condemn terrorism has been shown 
enough. After all, aren't we equally affected? If you are an average 
Muslim, living in  the vitiated climate generated by such  blasts, 
you're doubly affected. When a bomb goes off, it does not 
discriminate who it's going  to strike. In the recent incidents, as 
many Muslims were hurt as Hindus. An average Muslim also suffers the 
ignominy of the perpetrator being spread to the whole community. That 
makes him twice as vulnerable as the next citizen. It's common sense 
that he would condemn it.

In the context of the 1993 serial blasts, it was assumed that many 
Muslims approved  of them...

Much water has flown under the bridge since then. The total picture 
of those times is known to everybody. If anyone still doesn't know, 
he should just pick up a copy of the Srikrishna Commission report. 
The blasts were a consequence of the '92-'93 riots. If you give 
people the ground to sow poisonous seeds, that's what's going to 
grow, and it takes time to weed them out.

That could be taken as a justification of the blasts.

It is not. Consider this: A mass movement has been going on against 
the police all over the country for decades. Police stations have 
been blown up. There's been insurgency in the north-east for five 
decades now. Should we allocate blame to whole communities  involved 
in these movements? Only the mischievous and ill-informed would do so.

What do you make of the participation of Muslim areas in the Shiv 
Sena bandh after  the Ghatkopar blasts? Muslims said had they not 
participated, they would have been accused of not sharing in the 
city's grief.

Exactly, that's the kind of psyche we are generating. That bandh was 
totally uncalled for. If the Ghatkopar blast cost us a few lakhs, the 
bandh cost us Rs 150 crore. The bandh amounted to saying: 'You 
chopped off my nail, so I'll chop off my entire foot'.

But the participation of Muslims in the bandh was as widely hailed as 
their clapping for  India in the World Cup tie against Pakistan.

That's such a childish attitude. Those who rejoice at such things are 
either lacking in  information or have a deep political interest in 
spreading misinformation. Wherever India plays, local Indians come 
out to cheer the team. Should the host country turn against them and 
ask them to leave the country? As one living in a family of 
practising Muslims, I cannot count six persons who cheer when 
Pakistan wins. Which world are we living in when we rejoice at 
Muslims  clapping for India? This time too, headlines were made out 
of the fact that Muslims had helped the victims and donated blood, as 
if this was an extraordinary happening. The whole thing should've 
been reported without singling out any particular community.

Mumbai's Muslims were the only ones to  agitate against Kargil as a community.

That's the kind of psyche I was talking about at the meeting. I think 
such demons-trations are a waste of time. I've been an Indian and a 
Muslim all my life and that's what I hope to be  for the rest of my 
life. I don't see any less Indianness in me than in any non-Muslim 
and that's the truth I see in Muslims around me.

Does the assumption that these blasts are the handiwork of Muslims offend you?

A criminal is a criminal whatever label he operates under. It doesn't 
matter to me whether he's found to be a Muslim or a  Martian. He must 
be tried and punished. Does the burden of being involved in 
insurgency haunt the non-Muslim psyche? Is anybody exploding against 
all those who bear the name Veerappan?... Fact is, people are 
becoming aware that most of the ill-will is created by vested 
interests. This time, Mumbai has sent two clear messages. One was to 
those diabolical minds who perpetra-ted these blasts: 'You can hurt 
us, but you won't defeat us'. The second was to the politicians: 'We 
know you are going to fish in troubled waters but we won't be taken 
in'. The more we send these kinds of messages, the more we defeat 
those who want to divide us.

Do you think your community will heed your advice at the meeting?

Till Muslims feel their security lies in making such statements, they 
will continue to do so. Politicians whip up this kind of emotion and 
because we are not well-informed, we get taken in. That's what the 
Third Reich was all about.

____


[7.]

The Indian Express, September 03, 2003
http://www.indianexpress.com/full_story.php?content_id=30834

Please stop branding us terrorists: Muslim areas in Ahmedabad shut 
down, silently
No one knows who called bandh but response is near total
Express News Service
Ahmedabad, September 2: For the first time in this city since the 
riots last year, a bandh was observed without any political 
affiliation-and exclusively in areas dominated by Muslims.

The bandh was unique in other aspects as well: there were no 
statements or appeals by any organisation, no one came out to enforce 
the bandh and yet virtually every one complied, shops remained closed 
and people stayed indoors. And by evening there was no one claiming 
success for the near-total bandh.

The bandh was provoked by an anonymous leaflet circulated in Muslim 
neighbourhoods. This leaflet claimed that the entire Muslim community 
is being branded as terrorists and that innocents were being 
targeted, a reference, police said, to the five local residents 
arrested in connection with the Akshardham strike.

''The tone and language of the leaflet was not at all crude; In fact, 
it was quite well-written. The tone was not inflammatory, it just 
made a bandh appeal,'' said a senior police officer.

''I don't know who called for the bandh but by participating, I am 
doing what little I can do to help those who are trying to raise the 
government from its slumber. I certainly feel that the government is 
just not bothered about us,'' said Hanif Sheikh, who owns a provision 
shop in Dhabgarwad.

The news of the leaflet spread last evening prompting the police to 
make security arrangements in the Muslim-dominated areas of Dariapur, 
Kalupur, Shahpur, Mirzapur, Teen Darwaja, Dhabgarwad, Karanj and 
Vejalpur.

''We did not want to take any chance when we heard of the anonymous 
leaflet. The bandh was peaceful and there was no untoward incident. 
No one was arrested,'' Joint Commissioner of Police (Sector I) P C 
Thakur told The Indian Express.

Though no one knew who issued the leaflet, word spread like wild fire 
this morning that all residents of Muslim areas are observing a bandh 
in protest against the arrests.

By afternoon, even shops in markets which were open in the morning 
downed their shutters. Shops and business establishments in areas 
like Jamalpur, Raikhad, Gaekwad Haveli and Khamasa which had opened 
this morning closed down by afternoon learning that shopkeepers in 
other Muslim areas in the city were observing a complete bandh. 
Interestingly, a row of shops owned by Hindus in Teen Darwaja also 
remained closed.

In the afternoon, residents of Kalupur and Dariapur, mostly women and 
children, assembled near Relief Road to take out a rally to protest 
against the arrests. However, after an appeal by Thakur, they 
dispersed peacefully.

The women who gathered to take out the rally too did not know who had 
given the bandh call. ''All I know is that the bandh is in protest 
against the arrest our religious leaders and others who have been 
wrongfully detained by the Crime Branch in the Akshardham case. I 
joined in to show my solidarity,'' said Nafissabanu of Dariyapur.

''This kind of arrests have been going on for quite sometime and I 
believe that many of those arrested are innocent,'' said Roshanbibi, 
another protestor.

As all the shops in these areas remained closed throughout the day, 
supply of essential commodities was hit. ''I had learned about the 
bandh call last night and knew things will not be available today so 
I stocked up milk for my little daugther yesterday night itself,'' 
said Mohammed Zuber. ''And even if we had to undergo some 
inconvenience, it's okay because the protest was against the illegal 
acts of the government and the police.''

_____


[8.]

Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003

DALITS, VOTE BANK, VIOLENCE
I.K.Shukla

In view not only of what happened in Gujarat but is threatening to 
happen on a continual basis in the electoral culture of Hindu fascism 
it is necessary to look a little closely into the Dalit question.

It is supposed that only Dalits should speak on issues pertaining to 
them. If Kanshi Ram and Mayawati exemplify the kind of spokesmen that 
Dalits have, it must be admitted that they inspire no confidence and 
that they did much disservice to the Dalit cause.

Kanshi Ram and Mayawati visited Gujarat to stump for Modi and his 
communal-fascist gangsters. They endorsed and encouraged thus the 
project of India becoming a Hindu Rashtra a la Gujarat under the 
bloody brutes of HinduTaliban, who have nothing in common with 
Hinduism except their accidentally  Hindu-sounding names .

Political contingencies and exigencies certainly must be factored in 
which would involve adaptation and adjustment to circumstances 
unforeseen or unimagined. Unimagined? Politics is the game 
imaginatively to provide for solutions in the event of unpredictable 
variables. But a party, ideologicaly committed, need not court 
disaster and disgrace time and again by its lurch into unprincipled 
behavior.

UP saw the spectacle of Mayawati's illusionist antics thrice and the 
Dalit cause was not edified or empowered  by it unless we confuse the 
leap in the personal fortunes of the leaders with that of their 
constituency, the destitue and deprived mass of people, called a 
minority by some demograhic sleight of hand.

Have these leaders been able to instil fearlessness and a sense of 
security and solidarity in the hearts and minds of the oppressed? 
Wishful thinking and bursts of ceremonial sloganeering apart, the 
answer, in tangible terms, would be NO, if facts of life are to be 
admitted honestly.

Have these leaders made  common cause with other oppressed sections 
of the citizenry, the other reviled and ravaged "minorities" like say 
Christians, Muslims, and Adivasis? Again, the answer is a resounding 
No. It would seem, they do not think it necessary to bond with the 
other exploited Indians
in order to defeat the monster of social iniquity of the ages, or the 
statist enforcement of the same by means devious and deplorable. 
Self-delusion could not be more fatal.

What these "leaders" have really succeeded in doing is their 
projection of the Dalits as a viable vote bank. Just a vote bank. A 
vote bank on the auction block. A vote bank open to the lure of the 
lucre. A vote bank susceptible to fraud and force by anyone. A vote 
bank amenable to an anti-social spree. A vote bank available for hire 
to commit crimes against humanity in exchange for drink, drugs, dope, 
and dollops of money. It is another matter that the big money goes to 
the honchos among them, not to the poverty-pulverized plebeians.

How formidably and ferally Dalits have been used as killers, 
arsonists, rapists, and brigands in Gujarat, the laboratory of Ram 
Rajya aka as Hindutwa (Hindu Fascism), points the way they would be 
used in all the planned pogroms against various segments of society 
henceforward, be they dissenters, independents, democrats, 
secularists, or just members of a minority community. This is an ugly 
and  prospectively ubiquitous prospect, horrifically violent and 
diabolically vicious.

Dalits to be used as slaughterers and scavengers, decimating other 
minorities, for the well being of Hindutwa cabal, for the 
perpetuation of ancient wrongs and modern crimes, for prolonging the 
tyranny of those parasites and predators who are charged with treason 
and who have been found committed to moral turpitude as a matter of 
principle and to their founding dogma of ethnic cleansing (genocide) 
of the minorities.

The forthcoming elections in four states and Lok Sabha may spell the 
doomsday for our minorties.

Dalits desecrating democracy, and destroying it, at the behest and in 
the interests of their tormentors, the staus quoist tyrants, the 
redoubtable saffronazis, the inveterate enemies of India. Dalis 
helping India become Gujarat?

Could Dr Ambedkar have foreseen this? Could even Gandhi have 
visualised it? END.

_____


[9.]

World Social Forum - Gujarat
A forum against all forms of Imperialist Globalization, Patriarchy, 
Militarism, Communalism (religious sectarianism, and fundamentalism), 
Casteism and Racism (oppression, exclusion and discrimination based 
on descent and work) and discrimination based on gender and Sexual 
orientation.
Invitation to participate in the preparatory meeting to conceive and 
construct alternatives to imperialist globalization.
Dear Friend,
As you are aware, people's movements across the world have realized 
that the imperialist led neo-liberal globalization does not provide 
any solution to toiling masses and people suffering from poverty and 
hunger. The sustainable economic development and social and economic 
justice lies in alternative models for people centered and 
self-reliant progress.
In an attempt to search alternative models, people across the world 
came together in 2001, 2002 and 2003 at Porto Alegre in Brazil under 
the umbrella of World Social Forum process to explore and propose 
such alternatives and there by to question the very legitimacy of the 
World Economic Forum which imposes a single economic order across the 
globe. The people believe that ANOTHER WORLD IS POSSIBLE.
The World Social Forum Moves to India

Since its inception in 2001, the WSF has been hosted in Porto Alegre, 
Brazil. About 20,000 people participated in the first WSF in 2001, 
55000 in 2002 and with well over one lakh delegates in WSF 2003, the 
Forum came to symbolize the strength of anti-globalization movement 
and became a rallying point for the worldwide protest against war in 
Iraq.
At the WSF 2002, it was proposed to host the Forum out side Brazil. 
This shift represents the need felt by the WSF process to reach out 
in a larger way to the African - Asian region where the two-third of 
the humanity lives. The cultural, linguistic, agro-climatic and 
demographic plurality and the diverse social movements of the country 
makes India an appropriate venue for the coming Forum.
The Asian Social Forum held in Hydrabad, India in January 2003, and 
other regional and thematic forums deepened the WSF process around 
the world. WSF 2004 to be held in India will address Afro-Asian 
concerns, while retaining its international perspective.
The WSF - India process aims to be widespread and inclusive by 
allowing a space for workers, peasants, indigenous people, dalits, 
women, minorities, immigrants, youth, human right groups, social 
activists, academicians, artisans, the media, parliamentarians, 
sympathetic bureaucrats, and all other concerned sections of civil 
society. WSF 2004 will consolidate the coming together of social 
movements, mass organizations, NGOs, and other sectors that were 
brought together on one platform for the first time in the recent 
Indian history at ASF 2003.
The principle focus adopted for WSF India:
· Imperialist Globalization
· Patriarchy
· Militarism and Peace
· Communalism (religious sectarianism and fundamentalism)
· Casteism and Racism ( oppression, exclusion and discrimination 
based on descent and work)
GUJARAT SOCIAL FORUM:
Gujarat has been a focus of international attention in recent times - 
from the wide spread social response to devastating earthquake to 
extreme sectarian violence of unprecedented scale. It represents the 
contradiction of a traditional society drawn into the vortex of the 
twin processes namely; globalization and nation building taking place 
simultaneously. At this juncture the Gujarati society is seeking to 
redefine its identity and clarify its interests. For this to happen, 
social and civil society movements need a space for dialogue and 
negotiation so that the best of Gujarat's tradition and liberal 
spirit gets translated into a modern identity, ethos and values of a 
democratic, secular and socially just human fabric.
We intend to make the context of WSF 2004 in January, to initiate a 
process of inquiry, sharing and clarifying that is informed by the 
experience and reflection of international struggle against 
imperialistic globalization, militarism, exploitation and oppression.
In this connection likeminded individuals, organizations and social 
movements have decided to   discuss the process of WSF in general and 
Gujarat Social Forum in particular.
We take this opportunity to invite you for the Preparatory Meeting to 
discuss the modalities to launch GSF and to make preparation for the 
WSF at Mumbai from 16-21 January 2004.
THIS IS A PREPARATORY MEETING. ALL FRIENDS, INCLUDING THOSE WHOM OUR 
COMMUNICATION HAS NOT REACHED ARE WELCOME. FRIENDS WHO RECEIVE THIS 
INVITATION MUST INFORM OTHERS TO ENSURE MAXIMUM INCLUSIVENESS.
Date   :   Monday, 8 September 2003
Time  :   10.00 a.m to 5.00 p.m
Venue:   Chhipa Community Centre
Next to Anjuman High School
Near State Bank Of India
Astodia Road, Gol Limbda
Ahmedabad- 1
In solidarity
OVER 100 activists from Gujarat
<mailto:gujsofo at yahoo.com>gujsofo at yahoo.com

_____


[10.]
Dear Friends,

You are invited to a workshop on

MALIMATH COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: ISSUES AND PERSPECTIVE
And release of Justice H. Suresh's Book "Fundamental Rights as Human Rights"

The workshop is aimed at an analysis of the proposals and 
recommendations of the Justice Malimath Committee for the reform of 
the Criminal Justice System.

It is felt that the recommendations of the committee are aimed not at 
achieving justice, but at simply making it easier for the State to 
get convictions in Criminal trials.  The recommendations, if 
accepted, would stand in the way of natural justice and fairness.

This workshop, is one of a series of meetings, that will take place 
all over the country, to make people aware of this negative side of 
the recommendations and how it could affect us.  We therefore call 
upon you to attend the workshop and participate actively in it.

"FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AS HUMAN RIGHTS" by Justice H. Suresh, (Retd). 
and published by Sabrang Publications will  be released on the day.

AGENDA FOR THE WORKSHOP

  Inaugural Session :- "Overview  of the Malimath Committee Report"

       Release of "Fundamental Rights as Human Rights"

       9:30AM - 10:00AM
      Speaker :        Justice H.  Suresh (Retd.)
	Javed Anand, Sabrang Communications,

                               Release by Adv. P. A. Sebastian
     
       First Session:- "Rights of Accused"
       10.00AM - 11:30PM
      Chairperson:   Justice H. Suresh (Retd.)
Speakers:        Adv. Lalit Chari
                       Adv. Monica Sakhrani

       Second Session :- "Investigation"
      11:45PM - 01:00PM
      Chairperson:  Mr. S.S. Puri, Former Director General of 
Anticorruption Bureau & Director Public Prosecution, M.S.
Speakers:        Adv. Dhairyasheel Patil,
                           Adv. Nitin Pradhan
     
       Lunch
       Third Session :- "Women's Issues"
    2:00PM - 2:45PM
      Chairperson:  Ms. Asha Bajpai
      Speaker:         Adv. Veena Gowda

       Fourth Session- "Prosecution and Punishment"
   2:45PM  - 3:45PM
      Chairperson:  Justice R.G. Sindhkar (Retd.)
Speakers:        Adv.Majeed Memon
                             Mr. Vijay Raghavan
     
       Tea.
       Fifth  Session- " Crime , Communalism and Terrorism"
       3:45PM - 5:00PM
      Chairperson:  Adv. P.A. Sebastian
       Speakers:        Adv. Mihir Desai
                            Adv. Surendra Gadling

Every session will be followed by a discussion on the issue.
  Venue: YMCA, Opposite Regal Cinema, N Parekh Marg, Colaba, Mumbai.
Time: 9:00am to 5:00pm             Date: 6th September 2003
For registration contact: Lalit Khandare at Tel: 23439651/ 23436692

_____

[11.]

HINDUTVA AT WORK Series:

Ganesha does what politics couldn't
PRATHIMA NANDAKUMAR
TIMES NEWS NETWORK[ TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 02, 2003 03:17:50 PM ]

AHMEDABAD: People of Vadodara are out on a pilgrimmage tour, having 
vowed to take the blessings of Lord Ganesha installed at every pandal 
this festival. But what is hard to miss is Narendra Modi sharing the 
limelight with Lord Ganesha in major pandals in the city.

If Modi makes a guest appearance in a wedding sequence in one of the 
pandals, he is sharing the dais with Prime Minister Vajpayee, even as 
both watch Lord Ganesha 'punish' Pakistani president Pervez 
Musharraf. At another traffic island, Lord Ganesha descends to give 
'darshan' to Modi amidst chanting of Ganesha Stotra.

Adorning the colourful, decorated pandals are political leaders and 
monuments like Akshardham. If mythological and philosophical themes 
are a rage, politics seems to be carving its niche in festivities too.

At Bajawada Chakaniya Pol, there is a pandal housing a gigantic idol 
of Lord Ganesha flanked by Modi and Vajpayee on either side. Ganesha 
is depicted holding Pervez Musharraf by his neck.

A khaki clad Vajpayee and a saffron clad Modi are already drawing 
huge crowds, while banners which read 'Aatankvadiyon ka sardar, 
Musharraf ka naash karenge Shree Ganesh' (Leader of the terrorists- 
Musharraf, will be destroyed by Lord Ganesh), gives a political 
ambience to the pandal.

At a traffic junction overlooking Sursagar, Ganesha descending to 
Earth has been a major attraction, which is also leading to chaos and 
traffic jam. Even as the traffic police helplessly try to clear the 
bulging crowd, Lord Ganesha appears before Modi 'chanting' Ganesha 
Stotra.

The list of political figures includes Sonia, Vajpayee and Modi, who 
are shown as part of a 'baraat' (wedding party). If Lord Ganesha is 
perceived as an omnipresent god, with depiction of 'Ashta Vinayak', 
he is also personified as other Gods - Shreeji and Lord Shiva. At a 
majority of pandals, the backdrop has a narration of mythological 
stories.

Surprisingly, a few pandals have a backdrop of Akshardham. The 
speciality of this pandal at Bagikhana, housing a giant replica of 
Akshardham is that, artists from Mumbai were specially invited to 
make them.

In Ahmedabad, sculptors say they had received orders to do sculptures 
of politicians, but could not take up the orders fearing police 
harassment. "We had thought about doing a tableau with a political 
theme. However, post riots, the police have prohibited us from 
working on displays that could inflame passions and threatened us 
with dire consequences. So none of us have been able work on these 
themes," said a Moreshwar Pitade, a sculptor. [...].
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/uncomp/articleshow?msid=161320

o o o

The Times of India
VHP to educate people about designs of terrorists
ANIL PATHAK
TIMES NEWS NETWORK[ MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 01, 2003 12:52:09 AM ]

AHMEDABAD: The Vishwa Hindu Parishad has plans to set up its own 
network to create awareness among masses about sinister designs of 
terrorists who are bent on creating disturbances like the twin Mumbai 
blasts which claimed 52 lives last week.

VHP international general secretary Pravin Togadia discussed the 
fresh initiative on the proposed campaign with senior functionaries 
during his two-day stay in the city.He told TNN that the VHP would 
soon constitute a separate wing comprising retired police and Army 
officials who would give training to VHP activists in big cities and 
towns on precautionary and remedial measures to be taken to foil the 
designs of terrorists.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/uncomp/articleshow?msid=155742


o o o


The Indian Express, 02 Sep 2003
VHP prepares kar seva kit for Saurashtra
HIRAL DAVE RAJKOT, SEPTEMBER 1: Saurashtra unit of the VHP, buoyed by 
the recent ASI report [...].
http://www.indianexpress.com/full_story.php?content_id=30766

______


The Indian Express, September 03, 2003
Sangh outfits suggest WTO alternatives (Pradeep Kaushal)
http://www.indianexpress.com/full_story.php?content_id=30826

_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

Buzz on the perils of fundamentalist politics, on matters of peace 
and democratisation in South Asia. SACW is an independent & 
non-profit citizens wire service run since 1998 by South Asia 
Citizens Web (www.mnet.fr/aiindex).
The complete SACW archive is available at: http://sacw.insaf.net

DISCLAIMER: Opinions expressed in materials carried in the posts do not
necessarily reflect the views of SACW compilers.

-- 



More information about the Sacw mailing list